We see the smoke, but is there fire?

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    Every time
    4291e014958be05b3ac4e11e2ded2536.jpg
     

    TickleChain

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2022
    338
    43
    Castle Doctrine
    Those fruits you speak of are always all over the news. They might not fit the description that you and I would call domestic T-word, or even be true, but that does not matter and it won't stop big daddy G from using their power against those they deem to be worthy of their labels.
    And the fruits that You and I would deem domestic tewwowism are the crimes I'm referring to.

    The only real, true racism I've ever seen firsthand was against me personally, and it wasn't by white people. Yes, I'm white. Well, tan :D

    I just haven't seen all this "white supwemacy" the left is always yappin' about. IMO, the "white supremacy" would vanish if they quit thinking about it.

    I've already stated where I see domestic tewwowists.
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    UN "declares war" on conspiracy theories


    2e0921378f431093d63d8f86e19ec042.jpg

    1bfdb41be2b439192657589a99738d5f.jpg
    3751c618df17ae3c54fda26f36b0f0c1.jpg
     
    Last edited:

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    I've seen the slogan "Hellen Keller was a fraud" a few times in the recent past but I never paid any mind to it, it sounded silly. I saw a meme earlier and it finally got me to bite, so I gave it a little attention.
    We all learned about her in school, everyone knows her name. She was innocent, disabled, harmless. It just sounds ridiculous to call someone like that a fraud, especially given all the time that has passed. Her reputation has held up all this time with not even a hint of rebuttal, why question it now? She has so many famously acclaimed accomplishments, such a great example of human resilience and determination.


    Well, how many of you actually sat down and really thought about what it would be like to be blind AND deaf, from a very young age, before you had a developed memory, enough to really start learning anything?

    I mean, this type of thing does cross my mind here and there but I've never tried to imagine in detail, what would my reality really be like if I couldn't see, or hear; 2 of the most important senses when it comes to shaping reality itself. It's really hard to imagine being capable of learning much of anything, much less any meaningful form of language.
    Yet, she was the first blind person to earn a bachelor's degree, was a humanitarian, wrote a dozen books, flew a plane, was involved in politics (there's your sign), among numerous other achievements.

    My whole life is a lie, not even something as innocent as Hellen Keller is safe


    www.bitchute.com/video/qB9RYEOjfriN/

    Www.bitchute.com/video/iWhJBa3G2sfB/
     
    Last edited:

    TickleChain

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2022
    338
    43
    Castle Doctrine
    I've seen the slogan "Hellen Keller was a fraud" a few times in the recent past but I never paid any mind to it, it sounded silly. I saw a meme earlier and it finally got me to bite, so I gave it a little attention.
    We all learned about her in school, everyone knows her name. She was innocent, disabled, harmless. It just sounds ridiculous to call someone like that a fraud, especially given all the time that has passed. Her reputation has held up all this time with not even a hint of rebuttal, why question it now? She has so many famously acclaimed accomplishments, such a great example of human resilience and determination.


    Well, how many of you actually sat down and really thought about what it would be like to be blind AND deaf, from a very young age, before you had a developed memory, enough to really start learning anything?

    I mean, this type of thing does cross my mind here and there but I've never tried to imagine in detail, what would my reality really be like if I couldn't see, or hear; 2 of the most important senses when it comes to shaping reality itself. It's really hard to imagine being capable of learning much of anything, much less any meaningful form of language.
    Yet, she was the first blind person to earn a bachelor's degree, was a humanitarian, wrote a dozen books, flew a plane, was involved in politics (there's your sign), among numerous other achievements.

    My whole life is a lie, not even something as innocent as Hellen Keller is safe


    www.bitchute.com/video/qB9RYEOjfriN/

    Www.bitchute.com/video/iWhJBa3G2sfB/
    I have lightly pondered being deaf and blind, on occasion. Can't see or hear. Completely blind where everything is black, or just legally blind with some level of vision?

    That story does provoke the question of whether she was lying or not.
    Flew a plane?
    Can't see or hear so how did she receive instruction (any many other questions)?
     

    MOTOR51

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    72   0   0
    Dec 23, 2008
    6,342
    113
    here
    I have lightly pondered being deaf and blind, on occasion. Can't see or hear. Completely blind where everything is black, or just legally blind with some level of vision?

    That story does provoke the question of whether she was lying or not.
    Flew a plane?
    Can't see or hear so how did she receive instruction (any many other questions)?


    She didn’t take off or land, it’s not that hard to understand. I bet its exhausting for you and gunrelated to see everything as a conspiracy. I encourage both of you to see what happened to your hero Alex Jones the last few days.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La

    She didn’t take off or land, it’s not that hard to understand. I bet its exhausting for you and gunrelated to see everything as a conspiracy. I encourage both of you to see what happened to your hero Alex Jones the last few days.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    I don't follow Alex but I do find him not only entertaining, but I also find that he is right about a lot of things, sometimes many years before those things come out as being true.

    Got a good laugh from this.



    As far as Keller goes, who's to say she did or did not do all the things she is said to have done, I personally can't say she did or did not. Doesn't stop me from analyzing it, if for nothing else than curiosity. I do find the whole thing a bit odd. I mean, being that she is the only blind and deaf person to accomplish the things she did, even after all the modern advancements, that's kinda the literal definition of odd.
    So, it's intriguing to ponder.
    If I were unable to see or hear, without having any real memories of either of those senses, I will confess that I would be a lost cause. I would have nothing to base my reality on. What am I? How do I even know what I am? Am I a frog? Am I a refrigerator? I mean, how do you build a reality that is based on darkness and no form of real communication? How would I learn enough about society to form any type of political opinions, much less be a socialist activist, or be a big part of several political movements?
    You don't have to be a loon to question the legitimacy of something like that, even if it has been accepted as truth for so long.
    Maybe she did, maybe she didn't. I lean towards the latter, as of yesterday, and I will continue to do so until verifiable information changes my mind.
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    I don't want anyone changing my mind for me, I am fully capable of doing so myself. Thanks anyway.
    96abd28afb48e9df0b390e7a1ce79d94.jpg
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    Also, we can criticize Jones and call him a wacko all day long but just so you know, if they are allowed to take his speech, what's to say the same won't happen to anyone else once they deem what you have to say as misinformation?
    I don't care what anyone says, even if I don't like it or if I know it isn't true, I will still defend their right to say it.
    9b251eceb9124c3aca2021c9e3fd0790.jpg
     

    MOTOR51

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    72   0   0
    Dec 23, 2008
    6,342
    113
    here
    Also, we can criticize Jones and call him a wacko all day long but just so you know, if they are allowed to take his speech, what's to say the same won't happen to anyone else once they deem what you have to say as misinformation?
    I don't care what anyone says, even if I don't like it or if I know it isn't true, I will still defend their right to say it.
    9b251eceb9124c3aca2021c9e3fd0790.jpg

    You can’t make up things about someone and blast them all over your platforms and expect there not to be any consequences. Our forefathers had tact and would not be accusing parents of murdered children of being “actors”. Jones is a piece of worthless crap
    and deserves everything he gets. Hiding behind freedom of speech is a coward move, he spread lies and hurt people to further his role as the head of looney conspiracy nuts. If anyone tries to stand up for him then they are miserable people as well.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    You can’t make up things about someone and blast them all over your platforms and expect there not to be any consequences. Our forefathers had tact and would not be accusing parents of murdered children of being “actors”. Jones is a piece of worthless crap
    and deserves everything he gets. Hiding behind freedom of speech is a coward move, he spread lies and hurt people to further his role as the head of looney conspiracy nuts. If anyone tries to stand up for him then they are miserable people as well.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    So he takes the lick for that, but he should not have his most basic right limited or taken away.
    It's also been theorized that he is a shill, purposely leading people with a bit of insider truth, while steering a narrative for people who are attracted by the things he actually exposes.
    That's why I don't follow him, because I don't know that I can trust him. I still sometimes give him my attention, given his history of speaking about things that others won't. I just take it in for awareness.
     

    MOTOR51

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    72   0   0
    Dec 23, 2008
    6,342
    113
    here
    So he takes the lick for that, but he should not have his most basic right limited or taken away.
    It's also been theorized that he is a shill, purposely leading people with a bit of insider truth, while steering a narrative for people who are attracted by the things he actually exposes.
    That's why I don't follow him, because I don't know that I can trust him. I still sometimes give him my attention, given his history of speaking about things that others won't. I just take it in for awareness.

    He has no right to spread that BS about dead children.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    He has no right to spread that BS about dead children.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Being that he did that, he has no right to speak to an audience at all?
    Like I said, today it's him, tomorrow it's me, then you.
    All it takes is that label. It always starts with the low hanging fruit that not everyone is willing to defend, then it grows to include those stood by and watched or gave it the pass.
    We should defend the right of anyone to speak to whoever is willing to listen, even if we don't agree with everything they have said.
    ff0ee8eefad81078f8e53bf77539e880.jpg
     

    MOTOR51

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    72   0   0
    Dec 23, 2008
    6,342
    113
    here
    Being that he did that, he has no right to speak to an audience at all?
    Like I said, today it's him, tomorrow it's me, then you.
    All it takes is that label. It always starts with the low hanging fruit that not everyone is willing to defend, then it grows to include those stood by and watched or gave it the pass.
    We should defend the right of anyone to speak to whoever is willing to listen, even if we don't agree with everything they have said.
    ff0ee8eefad81078f8e53bf77539e880.jpg

    He can speak to whomever he wants to whenever and however he wants to, as long as he doesn’t call dead children and their parents fake. I’m going to assume you aren’t defending that speech right?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    He can speak to whomever he wants to whenever and however he wants to, as long as he doesn’t call dead children and their parents fake. I’m going to assume you aren’t defending that speech right?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    We can agree that people should be held liable if they cause damages.
    I did not watch the trial, nor do I know the complete details of the accusations of malice against him. That said, if the only damage that is done is hurt feelings, then I don't see any criminality there; poor taste, sure. Not saying that's all there was to it, because again, I don't know all the details.

    But they want him deplatformed completely. If he is guilty of criminal misconduct because of something he said, then he should be held liable but he should not be deplatformed, he should not be banned from social media. The get away with this, just like with Trump, because they are not considered a public communication service.
     

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    195,221
    Messages
    1,546,084
    Members
    29,168
    Latest member
    Lyle.lejeune2017
    Top Bottom