Ok someone help me understand. I don’t necessarily need a BOS if I sell you a gun but why would I specifically not want one? Generally the buyers prefer no BOS if anyone specifically wants to not have one. Also how would this infringe on anyone?
To expound on your point. Say I have no guns and no training where do I start? Do I take training in all three so I can decide which is for me? Honestly it’s a question with no one-size answer. The sooner everyone comes to grips with that the better off we wil all be.
What when you were a kid you and your buddidn’t have bear spray wars like we did with bottle rockets?:mamoru:
What happened Wednesday was complete and utter horse crap. Even if you believe it’s bogoloo time you have to know that was effing stupid. Their was no obtainable goal worthy of...
Renting a motorhome may be a good idea. Many of the smaller ones get 12-16mpg they have better facilities and can be utilized while under way (probably better to at least pull off) if you so chose. You’ll burn the same amount of fuel pulling the pop up and add extra wear and tear to your Jeep...
That’s not exactly a fair assessment. You have no sympathy for someone who allowed themselves to be victimized. If you said you had no sympathy for me when I was acting an idiot and rolled my 4wheeler it would be having no sympathy for someone who made a bad decision. Those aren’t the same...
I understand this logic but near circular. If pooky steals your tablet and trades it for a Saturday night special by your logic you are still responsible for a criminal having a gun.
Now keep in mind I’m not advocating for this but behind tented windows and locked doors would be logically precautionary measures compared to the the back glass iof an unlocked truck with the windows down.
It’s worth mentioning again one can smash and grab a home pretty quickly. Seconds even...
Ok so at what point would I get your sympathy? How many redundancies? I’ve never attempted to burglarize a home but I would bet I could get in and out of 95% of the homes of people on here, steal plenty of valuables (likely guns) and be gone long before someone shows up to stop me. Affordable...
Its marginally harder at best to break into a house instead of a car. How do you feel about people’s homes being broke into and having guns stolen. What if they were stolen from a $300 safe in the home. How many layers of ‘this is mines don’t touch it’ does a guy need before it’s not ok for...
This
As much as I may want to crush some belligerent A-holes skull, I have more important things to do with my life.
It is enjoyable to see someone behaving like a douche nozzle get all but curb stomped. Violence is an effective means of communication, but it’s unfortunately been all but...
And this is why I struggle to believe most conspiracy theories. You rely on everyone involved sharing the same values concerning the subject and then you have to rely on them not shooting their mouths off while out with there buddies, pillow talk, or getting pissed off and spilling the beans for...
I don’t object to idle speculation in general but the dogma regularly uttered by a contingent in the gun community concerning primary market gun sales is counter productive to bringing new gun owners into the fold. I believe it’s also utilized by a smaller contingent of unscrupulous people...
The above underlined sentence we are in 100% agreement on. I’m not a fan A and T should be absorbed by the FDA and F has no business being regulated by the Federal Government.
It’s a coincidence that I popped on here today when you were posting things that might amuse me. It’s ironic that a guy who would rather the ATF keep their distance from his residence would call them to provoke them.
No, no we agree. This data collection effort was minuscule by comparison to a ‘master list’ for gun confiscation. That’s the massive amount of data they won’t be marching through in any hurry.
The data collection has always been my biggest argument against the government’s ability to collect...
Not a lawyer but my instincts say no. Not for items outside their mandate. Now things inside their mandate I would suspect they would need reason to believe something was illegal concerning the purchase. Maybe an item was being sold that was intended to skirt the law but the manufacturer wasn’t...
It seems you revived your tired argument that there was a readily available list that a faceless government agency could use at a moment’s notice to start seizing guns. Your flaw in logic was you compared a few hundred (maybe even a few thousand) kits to the arguably 300 million and ever rising...