So what you’re saying is, don’t pull them out of the closet just yet? LOLI see many drowning victims trying to retrieve them since a magnet and a string won’t do it. Tomorrow another judge will overturn the overturn….and so on and so on…
Not a lawyer, but I don't think so. After US Court of Appeals, I believe the Administration will have to take it to SCOTUS if they want to keep the ban in place. And if they frame it as governmental overreach, it has a pretty good chance of being struck down since SCOTUS handed down the other ruling smacking govt overreach, last year, I'd think.I see many drowning victims trying to retrieve them since a magnet and a string won’t do it. Tomorrow another judge will overturn the overturn….and so on and so on…
That was about compensating owners for their loss when destroying the prohibited item, not necessarily about the standing of the ban. The framing of the case often makes all the difference of on whether it will be heard or not.Didn’t the SCOTUS decline the case a few months ago? Would this force them to make a ruling and no longer ignore it?
Usually, a Federal Appeals Court ruling is only applicable in the Circuit that decided it. Here this is the 5th Circuit. However, they sent it back to the lower court to reconsider what to do next.Not a lawyer, but I don't think so. After US Court of Appeals, I believe the Administration will have to take it to SCOTUS if they want to keep the ban in place. And if they frame it as governmental overreach, it has a pretty good chance of being struck down since SCOTUS handed down the other ruling smacking govt overreach, last year, I'd think.