ATF funds use

[IlivnDaBoot!]

Just received this in my Google feed and thought to myself that this is where the money should be going in the first place. Would you you be more willing to pay the tax stamp if the money was ACTUALLY being used to benefit gun owners? (I.e hunters)

Rep. Moore introduces legislation to strategically reallocate ATF tax revenues

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) has proposed legislation that would enhance wildlife and habitat conservation/recreation programs by reallocating tax stamp funding from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Moore and U.S. Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) jointly...

www.cachevalleydaily.com

 

[Jstudz220]

I agree that I’d much rather see the money go there than to the ATF. I feel tax stamps are an infringement all together and would like to see them done away with permanently and everyone who ever had to pay for one reimbursed. I can’t think of a single gun law that actually works as intended. Unfortunately these are the rules we have to follow to play. It is what it is at this point I suppose but hopefully a lot of that changes in the near future.

 

[323MAR]

It's taxation with representation, so it's a step in the right direction. I would prefer silencers to become Class 1 with the usual excise tax that already goes to Federal conservation efforts.

 

[IlivnDaBoot!]

It's taxation with representation, so it's a step in the right direction. I would prefer silencers to become Class 1 with the usual excise tax that already goes to Federal conservation efforts.

I'd DEFINITELY be on board for that!

 

[V.Taltos]

I don't trust politicians. I haven't looked at the language the bill uses but if it includes anything about money for the Global Biodiversity Assessment, that's what they are calling it when they limit how many farmers there are and how much land they can develop, restrictions on 'unsustainable activities' as well as 'returning existing land to native habitat condition' which is an Agenda 21plan to steal rural landowners land and prevent people from making any use of it whatsoever. As people begin talking about these topics and protesting, they have started changing what they call these ideas. Word games to hide what they are doing.

Maybe this is legit and doesn't have any sneaky language or goals, I don't know.

 

[IlivnDaBoot!]

I don't trust politicians. I haven't looked at the language the bill uses but if it includes anything about money for the Global Biodiversity Assessment, that's what they are calling it when they limit how many farmers there are and how much land they can develop, restrictions on 'unsustainable activities' as well as 'returning existing land to native habitat condition' which is an Agenda 21plan to steal rural landowners land and prevent people from making any use of it whatsoever. As people begin talking about these topics and protesting, they have started changing what they call these ideas. Word games to hide what they are doing.

Maybe this is legit and doesn't have any sneaky language or goals, I don't know.

WOWWWWWW! Now that's some dirty underhanded stuff right there. You're right about that, they will use terminology that people don't know to keep them ignorant. It's just like how they've done away with TRULY teaching kids to learn and are teaching just so kids can pass the test and the state/ Parrish can get more funding. SMH