GunRelated
Well-Known Member
Another random thought, something that has come across my mind a few times lately.
So, I remember when I started high school, I think it was actually my freshman year at walker high when uniforms were forced onto students. At the time, and for a long period after, and maybe even currently, the reason given for enforcement of uniform dress code was to be more "inclusive" to students who's families could not afford name brand clothing. I didn't like it for a number of reasons but I somewhat bought the reasoning, although, you could still clearly tell the difference between most name brand uniforms compared to cheaper ones.
Fast forward to today, where uniform dress code is still enforced, yet we have a bank, fast food, AND a NIKE store right there inside the school.
So much for the initial reasoning for the uniforms, am I right?
Anyone else see a problem with this?
So, I remember when I started high school, I think it was actually my freshman year at walker high when uniforms were forced onto students. At the time, and for a long period after, and maybe even currently, the reason given for enforcement of uniform dress code was to be more "inclusive" to students who's families could not afford name brand clothing. I didn't like it for a number of reasons but I somewhat bought the reasoning, although, you could still clearly tell the difference between most name brand uniforms compared to cheaper ones.
Fast forward to today, where uniform dress code is still enforced, yet we have a bank, fast food, AND a NIKE store right there inside the school.
So much for the initial reasoning for the uniforms, am I right?
Anyone else see a problem with this?