Roe v Wade overturned

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • RaleighReloader

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    33   0   0
    Jan 30, 2015
    1,177
    48
    Baton Rouge, LA
    It's interesting that during the pandemic, "conservatives" were up in arms about the state wanting to mandate masks. Apparently a piece of cloth over someone's mouth was an egregious violation of one's right to medical self-determination.

    But pregnancy? Game on.

    Every "conservative" that supports this is no better than the leftist gun banners that want to mandate how we can defend ourselves and our family. It's nothing more than the state wanting to legislate every little aspect of our lives—and using state-sanctioned violence against us when we have the audacity to think for ourselves.

    A long time ago, conservatism was about small government and minding your own damn business. I guess that's dead and buried.

    Mike
     

    highstandard40

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 14, 2009
    1,365
    63
    Prairieville
    I have no desire or interest in starting an argument on this issue. It's pointless and won't change any minds one way or the other. But an intelligent examination of the facts involved here should be taken into account. This judicial decision has nothing to do with telling women what they can or can't do. The federal government never had that power to begin with. Roe v Wade was an unconstitutional decision to start with. There is nothing in our constitution concerning abortion. Those decisions are to be made on a state by state basis. So this recent judgement had a strictly constitutional basis, just like their recent judgement in favor of second amendment rights. It's good to finally have a Supreme Court that does what it's supposed to do, determine the constitutionality of laws.
     

    lesgeaux

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Oct 18, 2009
    549
    43
    Marrero, LA
    A day when Fed.gov is stripped of overreach they never should have had in the first place is a good day. The SCOTUS finally has corrected this. RBG the used to be lib goddess questioned the validity of r v w on record. Now as libs, tantrum animals that they are, are holding RGB in contempt.
     

    GunRelated

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Feb 22, 2012
    3,554
    113
    Walker, La
    It's interesting that during the pandemic, "conservatives" were up in arms about the state wanting to mandate masks. Apparently a piece of cloth over someone's mouth was an egregious violation of one's right to medical self-determination.

    But pregnancy? Game on.

    Every "conservative" that supports this is no better than the leftist gun banners that want to mandate how we can defend ourselves and our family. It's nothing more than the state wanting to legislate every little aspect of our lives—and using state-sanctioned violence against us when we have the audacity to think for ourselves.

    A long time ago, conservatism was about small government and minding your own damn business. I guess that's dead and buried.

    Mike
    The mask comparison is extremely weak. Anything less than a respirator and you are pissing in the wind and most likely doing more harm than good, both physically and psychologically.
    On the other hand, with abortion, there is a strong argument on both sides but personally, if you are ok with purposely killing a baby in the womb, then you should also be perfectly ok with killing a baby outside of the womb. The only difference there is you don't have to look at it while you kill it when it's inside someone.
     

    sarky

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2011
    79
    8
    Sometimes the ignorance of some of you is down right embarrassing! Southern CONSERVATIVES were the slave owners. The FACT that some of you still want to claim that the Republican Party of today is the same as it was in Lincoln's time is absurd and can be proven WRONG! Either educate yourselves or grow up. You are supposed to be responsible adults.
     

    Direwolf

    Extremist
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2008
    6
    3
    Mandeville
    It's interesting that during the pandemic, "conservatives" were up in arms about the state wanting to mandate masks. Apparently a piece of cloth over someone's mouth was an egregious violation of one's right to medical self-determination.

    But pregnancy? Game on.

    Every "conservative" that supports this is no better than the leftist gun banners that want to mandate how we can defend ourselves and our family. It's nothing more than the state wanting to legislate every little aspect of our lives—and using state-sanctioned violence against us when we have the audacity to think for ourselves.

    A long time ago, conservatism was about small government and minding your own damn business. I guess that's dead and buried.

    Mike
    Apples and oranges. All overturning RvW does is return the issue of abortion to the states. Since abortion, and healthcare in general, is not mentioned in the Constitution, it falls under the 10th Amendment.

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
     

    dantheman

    I despise ARFCOM
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    65   0   0
    Jan 9, 2008
    7,441
    113
    City of Central
    Apples and oranges. All overturning RvW does is return the issue of abortion to the states. Since abortion, and healthcare in general, is not mentioned in the Constitution, it falls under the 10th Amendment.

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
    Don't try to dilute the hysteria by injecting facts into the mix .
     

    TickleChain

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2022
    338
    43
    Castle Doctrine
    With all this (typical) leftist mayhem over this "issue", I've started wondering if protesting red flag laws would be worthwhile.

    (This is satire, of course)

    We're too busy earning a living and trying to enjoy Life a little.
     

    TickleChain

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2022
    338
    43
    Castle Doctrine
    Sometimes the ignorance of some of you is down right embarrassing! Southern CONSERVATIVES were the slave owners. The FACT that some of you still want to claim that the Republican Party of today is the same as it was in Lincoln's time is absurd and can be proven WRONG! Either educate yourselves or grow up. You are supposed to be responsible adults.
    Were the black slave owners Conservatives?
     

    sarky

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2011
    79
    8
    Were the black slave owners Conservatives?
    Wow, that is you response??? Did blacks own the majority of the slaves? Did blacks import slaves and sell them? Did blacks start a civil war to keep their slaves??? Nope, those were all southern WHITE conservatives
     

    AustinBR

    Make your own luck
    Staff member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Oct 22, 2012
    10,792
    113
    Wow, that is you response??? Did blacks own the majority of the slaves? Did blacks import slaves and sell them? Did blacks start a civil war to keep their slaves??? Nope, those were all southern WHITE conservatives
    Just a note that US Civil War wasn't completely fought over slavery and that there were slaves in both the north and the south before, during, and after the war.
     

    Jstudz220

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Oct 14, 2020
    1,922
    113
    Harvey Louisiana
    In my opinion rape does not justify preventing someone from existing. Incest on the other hand I am kind of okay with because of all the major birthdefects caused by two people related to each other.
    Idk if I agree with that. If a woman is raped and impregnated I can see why they would want an abortion.
     

    TickleChain

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 16, 2022
    338
    43
    Castle Doctrine
    Wow, that is you response??? Did blacks own the majority of the slaves? Did blacks import slaves and sell them? Did blacks start a civil war to keep their slaves??? Nope, those were all southern WHITE conservatives
    1 - either that was my response or it only looks that way to you.

    2 - some black slave owners had MANY slaves. Either all slave owners obtained their slaves the same way or there must've been a One-Stop Slave-Mart for the non-white slave owners.
    Maybe that's why some of you anti-American individuals want to erase American History, so you can rewrite it with your emotion- and hate-driven falsehoods.

    3 - your anti-Conservative (and anti-white) rhetoric is mildly amusing.

    So, continue...
     

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    195,226
    Messages
    1,546,118
    Members
    29,169
    Latest member
    LanceK
    Top Bottom