Here’s a start. Took me 15 seconds. I’m finding it hard to believe you’ve never heard of such.
It’s been discussed on this site a few times that I can remember over the years and a few for instances have come up as well as names of people that give expert testimony and so forth. It’s enough for me to remember that something definitely happened before and not feel like I need to remember every detail to know something is true. In the end, the only person I care about here is me so I know what I know and I don’t care what you want to know or not.
I gotta admit, posting a YouTube video as a qualification of your point is laughable. YouTube isnt exactly a realistic source of info. Its the video version of passing along an opinion.
But I watched it for you, and of course they didnt cite a single case that these illiterate arguments resulted in a conviction.
Let me help you out here...If the shooter's actions satisfied LRS 14:20 then the rest is a moot point. Its either justifiable or not. Regardless if you have a bayonet hanging off your $4,000 dollar Gucci rifle with the Hubble telescope on top of it and firing RIP rounds.