26 million Americans believe that Violence is justified to keep DJT out of the WH: additional 58mil OK with it -

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Bolt Head

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 12, 2023
    1,287
    113
    Alexandria
    If they take him out…we (conservatives) will be next. There are many ways to silence the opposition. Their idea of peace is about the same mentality of peace in Gaza. Get rid of all the Jews then they will declare peace. We are to the point where it’s almost impossible to coexist as a people. Not the environment I want my young men and future grandchildren growing up in.
    We'll be next?
    They're not that big!
     

    John_

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Nov 23, 2013
    3,702
    113
    Hammond, LA
    Podna, there are clear distinctions, and the left is guilty of near-countless charges of being the violent aggressor the absolute-vast-majority of the time. You haven't learned your lesson yet, and it's seeming, more and more (to me), like you have your blinders on.

    The LONG list of references Perez provided you doesn't seem to have slowed you down a bit, and that's f**kin' sad. It is beginning to SEEM like your education (and potential indoctrination) is far-beyond your IQ (not surprising). I hope you choose to show me otherwise.
    Now you see, the discussion has been opposed but respectful. No where have I read in this thread Perez or sil-40 insult each other. In fact sil-40 has given accolades above to Perez for impartiality. But in your second paragraph above, unless I am miss-interpreting your intent (or meaning) above, insulting sil-40's IQ as low. Why the need to personally insult the man? Why stoop to that here?

    I don't believe for a moment @sil-40 will swing you or Perez's opinions or beliefs. But sil-40 has engaged in spirited counter discussion here, always respectfully.
     

    Bolt Head

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 12, 2023
    1,287
    113
    Alexandria
    Now you see, the discussion has been opposed but respectful. No where have I read in this thread Perez or sil-40 insult each other. In fact sil-40 has given accolades above to Perez for impartiality. But in your second paragraph above, unless I am miss-interpreting your intent (or meaning) above, insulting sil-40's IQ as low. Why the need to personally insult the man? Why stoop to that here?

    I don't believe for a moment @sil-40 will swing you or Perez's opinions or beliefs. But sil-40 has engaged in spirited counter discussion here, always respectfully.
    I did not say Sil's IQ was low.
    Sil is highly EDUCATED. The potential for indoctrination is also up there, as we see with education today.
    I alleged his education (and potential indoctrination) superseded his intelligence quotient.
     

    John_

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Nov 23, 2013
    3,702
    113
    Hammond, LA
    I did not say Sil's IQ was low.
    Sil is highly EDUCATED. The potential for indoctrination is also up there, as we see with education today.
    I alleged his education (and potential indoctrination) superseded his intelligence quotient.
    indoctrination = to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs.

    Respectfully, the same could be said for either you or I. What makes sil-40 any more susceptible to this potential indoctrination than anyone else?
     

    Bolt Head

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 12, 2023
    1,287
    113
    Alexandria
    indoctrination = to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs.

    Respectfully, the same could be said for either you or I. What makes sil-40 any more susceptible to this potential indoctrination than anyone else?
    You'll see.
     

    hotbiggun

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 25, 2023
    693
    93
    Louisiana
    indoctrination = to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, opinions, and beliefs.

    Respectfully, the same could be said for either you or I. What makes sil-40 any more susceptible to this potential indoctrination than anyone else?
    United states is not socialist Sil40 learned such things in college. It immoral and wrong.
    Socialism is a form of government that is not compatable with out Constitution.
    Now sil might say, he isnt a socialist but he does endorse and support the socilist running for office.
     

    John_

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Nov 23, 2013
    3,702
    113
    Hammond, LA
    United states is not socialist Sil40 learned such things in college. It immoral and wrong.
    Socialism is a form of government that is not compatable with out Constitution.
    Now sil might say, he isnt a socialist but he does endorse and support the socilist running for office.
    You don't even know the man (sil-40), never met him face to face, nor do you know in detail his background or history. Yet you paint a broad picture based on ASSumptions. I think that pretty much sums it all.
     

    Manimal

    Get'n Duffy!
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    May 27, 2007
    3,481
    113
    Louisiana
    This is why we're screwed. Right-wing people are too nice.

    On a Left-wing version of this site, with roles flipped, no one would be sticking up for the person with the opposing view. They would be doxing the person, getting them fired from their job, reporting them to agencies, and otherwise trying to completely destroy them...to eradicate them, mostly to cause them to starve to death, in the name of "justice."

    That's why they go out in the street and do not mind violence, it's all justified to destroy the opposing views.

    Those who do not actively participate in destroying the opposing view STFU and rationalize their silence even to the point of gaslighting themselves,to avoid thinking outside of the movement's end goal. They only alter course if they are told to do so by an authority where they place merit.

    Instead, right-wingers with 90% in common will fight each other over civility and the way they say things.

    I'm not judging because right-wingers do things out of moral goodness and honor, generally, with good intentions.

    But Individualism is inherently weak to the most powerful propaganda tactic, Divide and Conquer. We have to take note and be aware of that. We can be easily manipulated because of that general moral goodness and honor.
     

    hotbiggun

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 25, 2023
    693
    93
    Louisiana
    This is why we're screwed. Right-wing people are too nice.

    On a Left-wing version of this site, with roles flipped, no one would be sticking up for the person with the opposing view. They would be doxing the person, getting them fired from their job, reporting them to agencies, and otherwise trying to completely destroy them...to eradicate them, mostly to cause them to starve to death, in the name of "justice."

    That's why they go out in the street and do not mind violence, it's all justified to destroy the opposing views.

    Those who do not actively participate in destroying the opposing view STFU and rationalize their silence even to the point of gaslighting themselves,to avoid thinking outside of the movement's end goal. They only alter course if they are told to do so by an authority where they place merit.

    Instead, right-wingers with 90% in common will fight each other over civility and the way they say things.

    I'm not judging because right-wingers do things out of moral goodness and honor, generally, with good intentions.

    But Individualism is inherently weak to the most powerful propaganda tactic, Divide and Conquer. We have to take note and be aware of that. We can be easily manipulated because of that general moral goodness and honor.
    Your words are very true and very important. You get it.
     

    highstandard40

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 14, 2009
    1,399
    63
    Prairieville
    This is why we're screwed. Right-wing people are too nice.

    On a Left-wing version of this site, with roles flipped, no one would be sticking up for the person with the opposing view. They would be doxing the person, getting them fired from their job, reporting them to agencies, and otherwise trying to completely destroy them...to eradicate them, mostly to cause them to starve to death, in the name of "justice."

    That's why they go out in the street and do not mind violence, it's all justified to destroy the opposing views.

    Those who do not actively participate in destroying the opposing view STFU and rationalize their silence even to the point of gaslighting themselves,to avoid thinking outside of the movement's end goal. They only alter course if they are told to do so by an authority where they place merit.

    Instead, right-wingers with 90% in common will fight each other over civility and the way they say things.

    I'm not judging because right-wingers do things out of moral goodness and honor, generally, with good intentions.

    But Individualism is inherently weak to the most powerful propaganda tactic, Divide and Conquer. We have to take note and be aware of that. We can be easily manipulated because of that general moral goodness and honor.


    As long as we allow the "other side" dictate all the rules, we will always be on the losing end
     

    hotbiggun

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 25, 2023
    693
    93
    Louisiana

    John_

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Nov 23, 2013
    3,702
    113
    Hammond, LA
    Im all about MAGA and i hope im wrong but i cant imagine they will let trump take office and if they do he will be impeached and convicted within a year.
    I don't think so. If Trump wins the election straight up (electoral votes), I don't think they can stop him. Murder him would be about the only way.
     

    John_

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Nov 23, 2013
    3,702
    113
    Hammond, LA
    Dude...The fix is in. Hunter wouldn't have pleaded guilty if Kamala wasn't a shoo in. Hunter will be pardoned ASAP!!!

    "Hunter Biden is now scheduled to be sentenced for his felony gun charges in November, according to a recent order by the judge overseeing his case.
    Biden will be sentenced Nov. 14 in Wilmington's federal courthouse, the court where he was convicted of three firearms felonies earlier this summer."

    Joe Biden will pardon him before he leaves office January 20th, 2025. He has plenty of time after the sentencing. No matter what Biden has said in the past about a pardon. He isn't letting Hunter go to prison, that just isn't happening.
     

    hotbiggun

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 25, 2023
    693
    93
    Louisiana
    I don't think so. If Trump wins the election straight up (electoral votes), I don't think they can stop him. Murder him would be about the only way.
    There is that. During Trumps first term speaker of the house Tim Ryan (R)and about 50 republicans(check my numbers) resigned, retired or didnt seek election effectively throwing the Senate to the democrats. Effectively setting Trump up for impeachment. First time in history ruling party threw control of the house. It will happen again.
     

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    198,538
    Messages
    1,566,746
    Members
    29,871
    Latest member
    never miss at 200 yards
    Top Bottom