Red Leader
Well-Known Member
What's the advantages of each? Thinking about trading in my AR in 223 for one in 300 Blackout. Ballistics? Acoustics?
The .223 is light but it is supersonic and loud. If you desire to shoot suppressed, you must shoot a sub-sonic bullet, ie slow. The only way to have sufficient energy is to have a slow and heavy bullet.
Sorry to single you out, but this is just not a true statement. There is absolutely no rule that says you have to shoot sub sonic speeds if you want to shoot suppressed. I personally don't give two hoots about shooting subsonic ammo, as it serves absolutely zero purpose to me. I have two suppressed sbr's.... one in 223, and one in 300blk. Neither of which have ever seen subsonic ammo, and probably never will.
The sound between the two will be negligible.
disagree on this. The .300AAC is about 4-5DB quieter. It is absolutely noticeable. The .223/5.56 jumps up over 140DB, the .300AAC stays below it. Now for single shot, hunting scenarios, it probably IS negligible, unless you are trying to take out a whole pack of hogs. If hog hunting with it, I'd choose the heavier bullet ( .300). There is way more energy transfer inside of 300 yds.
If you shoot the omega on a .223/5.56 gun, buy the 5.56 end cap for the omega. it makes a BIG difference.
Sorry to single you out, but this is just not a true statement. There is absolutely no rule that says you have to shoot sub sonic speeds if you want to shoot suppressed. I personally don't give two hoots about shooting subsonic ammo, as it serves absolutely zero purpose to me. I have two suppressed sbr's.... one in 223, and one in 300blk. Neither of which have ever seen subsonic ammo, and probably never will.