Anti-gun Lautenberg trying to put amendment on Cybersecurity Bill

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Butrbal

    Rok Out Whit Ya Glock Out
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 28, 2012
    69
    6
    Prairieville
    Gun Owners of America
    Anti-gun Lautenberg trying to
    put amendment on Cybersecurity Bill
    *
    Washington is, to say the least, not a town known for its high moral standards.
    *
    But there is, perhaps, no one with more expertise in milking shameless advantage out of national tragedy than ultra-liberal senators Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
    *
    So it can hardly be a surprise that, this week, these anti-gun Senators intend to offer an amendment to the cybersecurity bill which would prohibit the manufacture of magazines with a capacity of over 10 rounds.
    *
    They appear oblivious to the fact that their “gun ban” mentality created a deadly situation in Aurora, Colorado, where there was a room with a number of trained military marksmen -- and none of them were allowed to have a gun.
    *
    Any one of those individuals could have made a big difference.* Heck, does anyone doubt there would have been a different outcome if George Zimmerman had been in the theater?
    *
    Incidentally, lest anyone think that banning magazines is the be-all-and-end-all for Lautenberg, he has already announced that he intends to follow up his magazine ban with legislation to monitor and limit your purchases of ammunition.
    *
    Explains the clueless Lautenberg:* “No sportsman needs 100 rounds to shoot a duck ….”
    *
    So this Einstein believes you don’t need 100 rounds of ammunition?* Who decided that our Bill of Rights should be a “Bill of Needs”?*
    *
    It’s time to nip this nasty piece of work in the bud and ensure that his efforts to exploit innocent victims for political gain do not go any further.
    *
    ACTION:* Click here to contact your Senators.*http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=61611571
    Demand that they vote against the Lautenberg-Schumer magazine-ban amendment to the cybersecurity bill.
     
    Top Bottom