lsufan1971
Well-Known Member
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...rel-rifle-issues-cease-and-desist-letter/amp/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This will be the first step in the downfall of a "pistol brace"
Watch "ATF vs. PISTOL BRACES, AGAIN! - The Fight For Gun Rights!" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/gCpUdKf9TmY
LOP should not be the issue... And that brace has a way less usable cheek rest than most of the other braces made.https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/sb-tactical-stands-with-q-llc-against-atf-honey-badger-ruling/
SB Tactical is standing with them which makes sense. There's plenty of talk that the pistol brace is also an issue because it extends too far to be used as a brace and has a place to rest your cheek. I don't own one so can't say for sure.
This video shows someone using it with the pistol brace without it being extended. Not sure how far it goes when extended but I imagine it'd be pretty close to where your elbow bends.
https://youtu.be/aNYYKrZNLmM?t=268
This part of the video has it extended next to his arm to give an idea.
https://youtu.be/aNYYKrZNLmM?t=254
Guess we'll see what the ATF does next but if Biden gets elected things are gonna get crazy
LOP should not be the issue... And that brace has a way less usable cheek rest than most of the other braces made.
LOP should not be the issue... And that brace has a way less usable cheek rest than most of the other braces made.
Except it still leaves the true reason completely unexplained which is ridiculous and totally unfair.Glad someone diagramed it out. I was following a thread on AR15 with a bunch of theories and that was one of them but glad it's been squashed.
The ATF doesn’t always (read rarely here) do things that make sense. It’s possible that they’re electing to see how this little bite plays out before proceeding with any further action. I would never doubt they’re ready for a full assault on all pistol braces and a whole lot more. Don’t forget the past sins and FUBARS of the ATF my friend.Q was notified by the ATF 8-3-20 to cease and desist concerning their Honey Badger pistol. So in 2 months after, I haven't heard or read of any other manufacturer receiving a cease and desist letter concerning AR pistols with braces. Don't you think if the ATF was going after AR15 pistols with braces, other manufacturers/assemblers would too have received ATF cease and desist letters? No one else in 60+ days?
I mean it seems like a common sense deduction to me.
Except it still leaves the true reason completely unexplained which is ridiculous and totally unfair.