How can you throw Sig Sauer under the bus? Sig is kickin ass and makin guns! Sig is supplying the Army and many police with the P320, parts and ammo, and producing to catch up with demand for the P365. Most retailers have waiting lists to get a P365.
Meanwhile S&W introduces a M&P version 2 and Glock introduces a model 19 with +2 capacity. Yawn, Yawn....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
It would be better if they made kick ass guns.
DoD evaluation says the Army’s new Sig Sauer P320 service pistol is riddled with issues (January 30, 2018)
https://sofrep.com/98976/dod-evaluation-says-armys-new-sig-sauer-p320-service-pistol-riddled-issues/
From the article:
"Perhaps more disconcerting, however, were the other issues the Pentagon’s testing exposed: in two instances, the trigger assemblies in pistols splintered apart during use – an issue that had never come up before Sig implemented changes to the trigger to resolve the drop-test failure. This means the new components intended to solve one problem may have inadvertently caused another.
The report also went on to indicate that the pistol has a propensity for ejecting live rounds alongside spent shells, though it clarifies that this does not usually result in a misfeed or malfunction. Nonetheless, ejecting live rounds could be a concern in combat zones, where every round may count in some survival situations. According to the tests, the issue becomes more prominent the more often the pistol is fired.
That isn’t the end of the MHS’ ammunition woes. While the pistol apparently has no issue cycling the Army’s new XM1153 *special purpose* cartridge, a hollow point round, it apparently does not function reliably when loaded with the standard XM1152 *ball* rounds used most often in service. In order to qualify as a military service weapon, the pistol must be able to fire 2,000 rounds without stoppages at least 95% of the time – a standard both the M17 and M18 pistols were able to meet with hollow points, but with standard ammo, that reliability rate dropped to a dismal 75% in the full size platform, and an even worse 60% on the compact one.
It is unclear what steps the Army has taken to resolve these issues, but the report does indicate that the Army is working with Sig to address them. In the mean time, the pistol platform began distribution to Army units last November, meaning those pistols will either suffer these reliability issues, or will have to be repaired in the near future."
Do you think those troops carrying the new Sig into a combat zone would rather a gun made by a kick ass company or a yawn yawn gun with proven reliability?