Your article makes no mention of the ammunition issues with the standard XM1152 *ball* rounds used most often in service. It only mentions *The MHS meets, or exceeds, all safety and operational requirements with XM1153 jacketed hollow point ammunition for which it is optimized.* The article I posted acknowledged that as well. Your article also does not address the trigger issue that arose after the trigger was upgraded. And your article doesn't mention that the live round ejection was addressed, only that it was reported. So of the 3 issues I quoted in my previous post, your article addressed none of them.
I am not the author, but the article concludes that Sig and the Army are addressing issues with a series of upgrades. Whatever your point is here, downgrading the P320, the Army is continuing to buy from Sig and the P320 is a damned good sidearm for the money.