Clinton: Iran is becoming a military dictatorship

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • crawfish

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 29, 2009
    423
    16
    south of 90
    All of the above nations have responsibly kept nuclear weapons for over one-half century. The US & the Russians are the only to keep really large nuclear arsenals.
    This genie just won't go back into the bottle, no matter who says what.
    BTW, should anyone ever trust a Clinton on anything?
    leVieux

    Do a little research on the accidents these nations have had over the years. Or maybe that nuclear warfare we used in Iraq (DU).

    Not to sound like a hippie, but once the 100 year or so life span is up - these things more than likely will end up contaminating the earth during decomissioning or waste storage. A treaty for non-proliferation is in all of our interests.
     

    CloudStrife

    Why so serious?
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2010
    3,156
    36
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Do a little research on the accidents these nations have had over the years. Or maybe that nuclear warfare we used in Iraq (DU).

    Not to sound like a hippie, but once the 100 year or so life span is up - these things more than likely will end up contaminating the earth during decomissioning or waste storage. A treaty for non-proliferation is in all of our interests.

    How so? Is everyone going to sign this treaty? No. The countries with the most nukes stand to lose the most. A non-proliferation treaty serves no purpose than as an attempt to put all superpowers on equal footing in terms of nuclear capabilities, never mind countries like North Korea who will just laugh at the rest of us.

    By DU, do you mean depleted uranium? Those would be armor piercing rounds, not nuclear bombs.
     
    Last edited:

    legg86

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 4, 2010
    201
    16
    Tickfaw, LA
    How so? Is everyone going to sign this treaty? No. The countries with the most nukes stand to lose the most. A non-proliferation treaty serves no purpose than as an attempt to put all superpowers on equal footing in terms of nuclear capabilities, never mind countries like North Korea who will just laugh at the rest of us.

    By DU, do you mean depleted uranium? Those would be armor piercing rounds, not nuclear bombs.

    And completely harmless, regardless what tabloids you may read. DU is simply NON-radioactive uranium used in AP ammo because its so dense and heavy. I wouldnt want to eat breakfast with a DU plate every morning, but it really isn't going to give you cancer if a round lands in your backyard.
     

    CloudStrife

    Why so serious?
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2010
    3,156
    36
    Baton Rouge, LA
    And completely harmless, regardless what tabloids you may read. DU is simply NON-radioactive uranium used in AP ammo because its so dense and heavy. I wouldnt want to eat breakfast with a DU plate every morning, but it really isn't going to give you cancer if a round lands in your backyard.

    I don't think the guys on the receiving end are concerned with cancer.
     

    CloudStrife

    Why so serious?
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2010
    3,156
    36
    Baton Rouge, LA
    And completely harmless, regardless what tabloids you may read. DU is simply NON-radioactive uranium used in AP ammo because its so dense and heavy. I wouldnt want to eat breakfast with a DU plate every morning, but it really isn't going to give you cancer if a round lands in your backyard.

    I don't think the guys on the receiving end are concerned with cancer. :)
     

    crawfish

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 29, 2009
    423
    16
    south of 90
    And completely harmless, regardless what tabloids you may read. DU is simply NON-radioactive uranium used in AP ammo because its so dense and heavy. I wouldnt want to eat breakfast with a DU plate every morning, but it really isn't going to give you cancer if a round lands in your backyard.


    NON-radioactive? low level maybe, but it's the dust after a shell impact that causes the health problems over time.


    You can blow it off as tabloids, but a lot of gulf war veterans are pretty convinced this is the source of their problems. Also check out the skyrocketing cancer and deformed baby stats from Iraq. The evidence is really mounting up that it's not as safe as advertised.
     

    Doug.38PR

    *Banned*
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 23, 2009
    1,257
    38
    Backwoods Louisiana
    talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

    She who wants to take all our guns, cram socialism down our throats and destroy what's left of true religion in the United States
     

    Mjolnir

    *Banned*
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    5,241
    36
    Baton Rouge, LA
    They will allways hate us, so why not kill them, we have the capability?

    Spoken like a hateful, small-minded little man... I believe you have a helluva lot of company in this nation today, unfortunately.

    You'll also die in your stupid attempt to "kill them all."
     
    Top Bottom