Federal judge strikes local gun ordinance

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • highstandard40

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 14, 2009
    1,377
    63
    Prairieville
    Can't wait to see how this will hash out.

    http://theadvocate.com/home/10089316-125/federal-judge-strikes-down-br


    "A federal judge on Monday struck down a Baton Rouge ordinance that bars the possession of guns in any establishment, including the parking lot, where alchoholic beverages are sold or consumed on the premises.
    Chief U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson’s ruling came in the case of Ernest Taylor, who was pulled over outside Romeo’s Lounge and arrested after Baton Rouge police found three rifles in his vehicle."
     
    Last edited:

    freedive10

    -Global Mod-, Caballoloco
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Sep 17, 2008
    2,165
    63
    Mandeville
    Nothing to hash out. Federal judge ruled in favor of a citizen who was within constitutional rights. Poorly thought out local ordinance and it seems the E.B.R Attorney's office knew it.

    "... the East Baton Rouge Parish Attorney’s Office drafted an email June 24 to Baton Rouge Police Chief Carl Dabadie suggesting the chief no longer enforce the ordinance because it *may have some constitutional problems.*

    Hey look, the system does work! Sometimes! ;)
     

    highstandard40

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 14, 2009
    1,377
    63
    Prairieville
    Yes, I agree there should be nothing to hash out. That never stops the gun grabbers from filing appeals and holding up the process of reverting back to constitutional rights.
     

    RedStickChick

    -Global Mod-
    Premium Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 6, 2012
    3,014
    38
    Baton Rouge
    Lots of different opinions floating around on this.

    Some are for it.

    Some are against it.

    Will be interesting to see how it pans out.
     

    charlie12

    Not a Fed.
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2008
    8,529
    63
    Pride
    That is one bad ordinance. I break it a couple times everyday by just going to the store down the road from my house.
     

    323MAR

    Well-Known Member
    Silver Member
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jan 15, 2014
    2,551
    113
    New Oeleans LA
    I thought Baton Rouge was conservative?
    This is Louisiana; not New Jersey.
    Perhaps there are special needs people on the city counsel there.
     

    Emperor

    Seriously Misunderstood!
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 7, 2011
    8,376
    113
    Nether region
    Nothing to hash out. Federal judge ruled in favor of a citizen who was within constitutional rights. Poorly thought out local ordinance and it seems the E.B.R Attorney's office knew it.

    "... the East Baton Rouge Parish Attorney’s Office drafted an email June 24 to Baton Rouge Police Chief Carl Dabadie suggesting the chief no longer enforce the ordinance because it *may have some constitutional problems.*

    Hey look, the system does work! Sometimes! ;)

    And one day, the state will completely remove it from the books along with the "Sodomy Law" that the police were still arresting people for, even though it was known to be Unconstitutional and everyone knew it, but the DA was still allowing people to be arrested even thought they weren't supposed to and knew it; and the Sherriff Sid Gautreaux knew his deputies were doing it and he didn't tell them to stop even though he knew it was not supposed to be enforced; all because somebody hates homos, and :blah:

    Ever wonder why any ill-conceived law is not opposed by voices of reason BEFORE they get enacted and improperly enforced at the expense of a law abiding citizen or the taxpayers?

    What do these government bodies have legal counsel for? To make sure the chamber Chik-fil-a order is right?
     
    Last edited:

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    195,905
    Messages
    1,550,570
    Members
    29,328
    Latest member
    TonyGuillory
    Top Bottom