senseiturtle
Well-Known Member
Preface: I'm no socialist, and I abhor the healthcare takeover, but this is pretty good food for thought. We haven't been truly "free" for a very long time, when will the public draw the line?
This was obviously written by a lib- because only a lib would believe the gov't was meant to "own" anything.
Of course it was written by a lib...
Although, none of the things mentioned concerned "ownership," just regulation. One cannot "own" medicine or healthcare, as it's a service -- the application of the provider's knowledge in affecting another's life.
The difference is, of course, that the government is trying to get you to pay for someone else's healthcare... (which you already do, thanks to medicare/aid)... whereas every other example here is a commercially produced but governmentally regulated product.
Remember that government cannot 'produce' anything (much like investment bankers, but that's another story).
Run for office and do something about that *truly* annoying commerce clause.