Fox 8 news at 9pm June15

[Emperor]

Does anyone on here know how to take an email from the LSA, and turn it in to a textable link?

I have a textable "hot link" for this now.

PM me if you want me to send it to you mobile!

 

[drill sgt]

Can you explain the reasoning behind your honest belief? I believe the contrary, in that I shouldn’t need special permission or pay the government for the right to practice a God given right as guaranteed by the 2nd amendment of our constitution and I’m pretty sure that’s the driving force behind this bill, but I’ll consider other explanations. I would think that someone who, as you say, cannot pass current requirements would also likely not be legally able to own a handgun anyway? In which case the passing of such a law wouldn’t help their cause at all, correct?
I’m eager to learn what requirements you’re speaking of that these folks can’t pass if they’re indeed legally able to own a handgun. Can’t afford the permit? Can’t afford the class? Can’t physically or mentally pass the class? Can’t approach the Sheriffs office without being arrested on outstanding warrants? Not trying to incite a BS special or anything. I’m just curious.

^^^^^^^ Not trying to stir the pot of hate and discontent but I am not against the passing of the constitutional carry bill. What I was refering to as to those not being able to pass the current requirements for concealed carry. Having a arrest record in their past even if for some minor misdemeanor offense and cannot get proof of outcome thru the courts because maybe from another state or being long time removed. Maybe have a divorce decree and outcome paperwork not available , maybe a domestic family issue , maybe under doctors care with certain medications being prescribed that are on a restricted list , maybe a long ago substance abuse problem that has been addressed and cleaned up , and even the money cost of the chp for some wanting to have one. I am sure that there are some current chp holders in possession of said permit that should not be allowed for different reasons but untill they step out of line and do something stupid they will stay current. Maybe they fell like they do not want big brother to be ever so involved in their lives. Why do we judge another persons actions or intent untill you have walked in their shoes. .................................................................... drill sgt.

 

[Magdump]

^^^^^^^ Not trying to stir the pot of hate and discontent but I am not against the passing of the constitutional carry bill. What I was refering to as to those not being able to pass the current requirements for concealed carry. Having a arrest record in their past even if for some minor misdemeanor offense and cannot get proof of outcome thru the courts because maybe from another state or being long time removed. Maybe have a divorce decree and outcome paperwork not available , maybe a domestic family issue , maybe under doctors care with certain medications being prescribed that are on a restricted list , maybe a long ago substance abuse problem that has been addressed and cleaned up , and even the money cost of the chp for some wanting to have one. I am sure that there are some current chp holders in possession of said permit that should not be allowed for different reasons but untill they step out of line and do something stupid they will stay current. Maybe they fell like they do not want big brother to be ever so involved in their lives. Why do we judge another persons actions or intent untill you have walked in their shoes. .................................................................... drill sgt.

I hear ya. I’m sure there are those who’d carry that would be a risk as well. But I don’t think the voice of those unable to obtain a CHP for legal reasons now is the push behind the bill at all. Also, I’m thinking many or most of those are likely denied the right to have a handgun in their possession already from the list you gave. I have a friend that has has a few months left until he can retrieve his firearms from a family member because his ex found a sympathetic ear in a judge and was able to secure a protective order on her word alone, although it was completely unwarranted. This law wouldn’t help him at all.

 

[Emperor]

Some politicians just "get it!"



Mr. *****,

Representative Bacala wanted me to let you know he is and always will be in favor of Constitutional Carry. He will continue to do his part as per the rights of the people under the 2nd Amendment.

Best,

Donna W. Hebert
Legislative Assistant to
Representative Tony Bacala
La House of Representatives
District 59
15482 Airline Highway
Prairieville, Louisiana 70769
Office Number: 225-677-8023
Fax Number: 225-677-8022
bacalat@legis.la.gov



From: r
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 8:56 AM
To: Bacala, Rep. Tony (District Office) <bacalat@legis.la.gov>
Subject: SB 118

Tony,

Thanks for the effort on SB118. Please keep pushing the Governor to sign it.

If he vetoes it, let’s override!

Sincerely,

R*******
Prairieville

 

[Horrible]

JBE was on the news repeatedly saying he will NOT sign it...

Not signing it and vetoing it are two different things. It’s my understanding that if the Gov does nothing, it becomes law 20 days after it hits his desk as the Legislature is now out of session

 

[Helmsman]

Here they say veto.
https://www.knoe.com/2021/06/16/gov-edwards-expected-veto-constitutional-carry-bill/

 

[Horrible]

Here they say veto.
https://www.knoe.com/2021/06/16/gov-edwards-expected-veto-constitutional-carry-bill/

If he vetos, it will take a *veto* session of the legislature and 2/3 majority vote in favor of the legislation in this special session to make it law

Politically, it would be smart of him to not sign and not veto. Allow it to be come law and when he runs for Senate, he can claim to be Pro-2A

 

[Helmsman]

I kind of agree. Anyway, it is about 10 days left to any action.

 

[Horrible]

Who makes the call to convene a *veto* session? Is it the Speaker and President of the Senate?

Edit: from the LA Constitution

[FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]Veto[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova] [/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]Session[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]. (1) A bill vetoed and returned and subsequently approved by two-thirds of the elected members of each house shall become law. The [/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]legislature[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova] shall meet in [/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]veto[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova] [/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]session[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova] in the state capital at noon on the fortieth day following final adjournment of the most recent [/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova]session[/FONT][FONT=DDG_ProximaNova], to consider all bills vetoed by the governor.[/FONT]

 

[SwampyDog]

Danny McCormick is pushing for one. Got an email asking for support
https://www.louisianastand.com/stopjbe

 

[Mannelite]

Hopefully it passes, what would really be awesome is if we passed the sanctuary bill or whatever so that the NFA didn't apply here.

 

[Core]

It's unconstitutional to infringe upon a free citizens right to bear arms period in the USA. Its a great awakening by citizens and states are falling in line, and the Supreme Court has already affirmed this. Sadly thousands of such unconstitutional codes muddy the waters and bureaucrats believe they have the right to infringe upon these guaranteed and protected rights.

 

[Horrible]

It's unconstitutional to infringe upon a free citizens right to bear arms period in the USA. Its a great awakening by citizens and states are falling in line, and the Supreme Court has already affirmed this. Sadly thousands of such unconstitutional codes muddy the waters and bureaucrats believe they have the right to infringe upon these guaranteed and protected rights.

Couldn’t agree more

 

[Helmsman]

It's unconstitutional to infringe upon a free citizens right to bear arms period in the USA. Its a great awakening by citizens and states are falling in line, and the Supreme Court has already affirmed this. Sadly thousands of such unconstitutional codes muddy the waters and bureaucrats believe they have the right to infringe upon these guaranteed and protected rights.

The question is how these bureaucrats can be held responsible. In most cases they are either recalled or fired at worst. I've heard there is a law in Florida that provides for a fine up to $5K for unconstitutional laws or something like this. Could be a good direction...

 

[Magdump]

The question is how these bureaucrats can be held responsible. In most cases they are either recalled or fired at worst. I've heard there is a law in Florida that provides for a fine up to $5K for unconstitutional laws or something like this. Could be a good direction...

There’s a federal law that says anyone violating constitutional rights under color of law is guilty of a felony. It has indeed been enforced on occasion. Not a light penalty either.

 

[Horrible]

There’s a federal law that says anyone violating constitutional rights under color of law is guilty of a felony. It has indeed been enforced on occasion. Not a light penalty either.

GFL getting any court to convict anyone in power or well connected.

Laws (moreover the ‘Supreme Law of the Land’) seems to be suggestions in the eyes of our elected officials.

 

[JBP55]

Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards has vetoed a bill to allow people to carry concealed handguns in Louisiana without a permit or training, which could fuel a growing movement for a veto-override session from the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Senate Bill 118 by Monroe Republican Sen. Jay Morris would have allowed anyone 21 and older to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. Current law allows concealed carry with a permit and training.