Lewis Unglesby can kill everyone in the room with assault weapon with eyes closed

[bwalke1]

man that's good shooting. http://theadvocate.com/news/5072827-123/assault-gun-ban-urged

 

[bwalke1]

duplicate thread, sorry

 

[DS727]

"Unglesby, a gun owner and hunter who said he twice has had a gun put to his head"

I have issue with whomever didn't pull the trigger.

 

[oleheat]

"Unglesby, a gun owner and hunter...."

Oh! Well Hell's Bells- he's just like us!





Seriously- Do these people think we're 8 yr olds??

 

[Emperor]

Yes, he is a douche!

Coincidentally, I sent this related letter to wbrz yesterday.

Dear News Desk,

This morning on Tune-in was yet another gun restriction related story (yawn). John P. was reading the lines associated with the story how attorney Lewis Unglesby was going to grace some forum with his profound opinion on why competent adult Americans should continue to be treated as children and submit to an assault weapons ban. Again, the word *clip* was erroneously used to describe the *magazine* of a firearm. Now, I couldn’t be certain if it was your staff that wrote that line for JP to read verbatim or if that was JP restating the words of Mr. Unglesby. Either way, if this gun debate is so important that your station runs them non-stop for weeks; then shouldn’t it be as important to research the terminology associated with these guns. Describing a gun’s magazine as a clip (unless the gun is a Garand or SKS), is no different than calling the viewfinder of a camera a scope.

So, if your research staff is still making this mistake, then I would suggest someone let them know so your anchors look a bit more knowledgeable in the future; and if however, that was the description used by Mr. Unglesby himself, then he has no business or authority telling ANYONE about his views on taking away their Right to own these guns.

Surprisingly, I got no response on this one. And they usually always do.

 

[mr.z28]

I want to punch a wall every time I read something like this...it honestly sickens me...

 

[Nomad.2nd]

man that's good shooting. http://theadvocate.com/news/5072827-123/assault-gun-ban-urged

...And someone with an AR and one round can stop him.

 

[Dgraham225]

How ironic, a LAWYER who's job is to defend a person in court (guilty or innocent, doesnt matter) for monetary gain wants to speak about public safety. I bet he's let more criminals walk the street in his lifetime that lead to more gun crime than my AR-15's ever have..

 

[oleheat]

*There isn’t a second side to this,* he argued. *To be for these weapons is stupid. If you think you need this type of gun, something’s wrong with you."

Since it's coming from a scumbag, I'll take that as a high compliment.

 

[csbutton]

"Lewis Unglesby can kill everyone in the room with assault weapon with eyes closed"

Unless, of course, he slips on his own slime trail and falls down first

 

[Emperor]

"Lewis Unglesby can kill everyone in the room with assault weapon with eyes closed"

Unless, of course, he slips on his own slime trail and falls down first

 

[jgreco15]

“Where do any of us live that we have to shoot 30 bullets in five seconds?” he asked.

I would hope that we never have to find out but as the saying goes; its better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it!

This guy is a real piece of sh!t who has no idea what the 2nd amendment is all about.

 

[Mayonnaise]

I had the displeasure of having a conversation with this scumbag not too long ago. He's a strange dude and likes to make sure everyone around him knows who he is and how well connected he is. Fortunately for us he's pretty well hated and the only reason this is getting press is because of how outrageous it was.

He's statements infuriate people just as much as mine would if I got on TV and told the world how I thought I should be able to walk into Walmart and buy a machine gun and a crate full of frag grenades. Same ****, different point of view.

If you give these clowns enough attention they will just keep coming back for more.

 

[oleheat]

If you give these clowns enough attention they will just keep coming back for more.

How true this is...... And the local media is doing it- so he is.

 

[bs875]

Ha, ha! MEM had a comment removed.

 

[Fred_G]

*There isn’t a second side to this,* he argued. *To be for these weapons is stupid. If you think you need this type of gun, something’s wrong with you.*

Oh no! There is something wrong with me! Should I call the gubment Wednesday and seek help? I think politicians should be tased when they lie. Would at least make it fun to watch them jerk us around.

 

[Vermiform]

Yes, he is a douche!

Coincidentally, I sent this related letter to wbrz yesterday.

Dear News Desk,

This morning on Tune-in was yet another gun restriction related story (yawn). John P. was reading the lines associated with the story how attorney Lewis Unglesby was going to grace some forum with his profound opinion on why competent adult Americans should continue to be treated as children and submit to an assault weapons ban. Again, the word *clip* was erroneously used to describe the *magazine* of a firearm. Now, I couldn’t be certain if it was your staff that wrote that line for JP to read verbatim or if that was JP restating the words of Mr. Unglesby. Either way, if this gun debate is so important that your station runs them non-stop for weeks; then shouldn’t it be as important to research the terminology associated with these guns. Describing a gun’s magazine as a clip (unless the gun is a Garand or SKS), is no different than calling the viewfinder of a camera a scope.

So, if your research staff is still making this mistake, then I would suggest someone let them know so your anchors look a bit more knowledgeable in the future; and if however, that was the description used by Mr. Unglesby himself, then he has no business or authority telling ANYONE about his views on taking away their Right to own these guns.

Surprisingly, I got no response on this one. And they usually always do.

QUIT IT! Quit educating the Liberals! Before, when they used the word "clip" it used to irritate me. Now when they talk about banning things and they use the word "magazine" it scares me. I liked it better when they at least sounded stupid.

 

[tim9lives]

People like Lewis Unglesby are very dangerous when they hold an office of power and then decide the laws for the rest of us. He is an ignorant egomaniac IMO.

To even make such stupid statements...that simply because he has a type of weapon...he can kill everyone in a room. People like Lewis Unglesby think they know what is best for everyone else. They do not value Freedom and Liberty. And I wonder if he has even read our Constitution of the United States.

They are the type who passed the law of Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920s.
They are the same mentality of people who feel that sugar drinks need to be banned. They are the type who feel it should be illegal to smoke a cigarette in a car or in your backyard. This guy is a dangerous and narrow minded man who thinks the world should do and behave as he lives his life.

 

[ry_kj_an]

I love getting lessons in morality and ethics from such a moral and ethical person. After all this is a man who has dedicated his career to defending CRIMINALS who have obtained ILLEGAL weapons to commit heinous unspeakable acts. Additionally, he has built a massive net worth taking high profile cases for the politically connected and affluent. You would think someone making comments such as these would be helping to enforce existing laws. Big Lew would stand to benefit handsomely from any new laws such as these and you can bank on this as his motivation.

 

[TomTerrific]

Didn't he have some serious health issues?

Or was it an addiction to pharmaceuticals?

I remember thinking he wasn't going to be around for very long.