Do you think that if the mouthy guy was a bit bigger than the guy who can't control his emotions, the emotional guy would have done anything?
Well, just found out my GSP is also a weapons sniffing dog. He found this on our morning walk... lol
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Hahahahaha! Bring the amber lamps. Classic!Almost as good as this classic...
https://youtu.be/iZjzfi6ncrA
talk **** and get your ass kicked...the way it should be
And after all that he was still running his mouth lolAlmost as good as this classic...
https://youtu.be/iZjzfi6ncrA
talk **** and get your ass kicked...the way it should be
wrong, you brought in a 3rd party.Guys goes to the zoo. Sees a sign that says "Don't talk to the tigers". Talks to the tigers. The zookeeper lets the tiger out to attack the guy.
That's a closer analogy.
wrong, you brought in a 3rd party.
Guy goes to zoo. Sees sign that says *Don’t antagonize the tiger.* Guy yells at the tiger and makes *tiger noises*. Tiger gets out, mauls guy.
Wrong again, what you consider rational is really just society pussifying the weak to not have consequences for overstepping their bounds of challenging the stronger...but want should we expect, I mean this is a topic on a gun forum in America.I did bring in a 3rd party because the first analogy had the direction backwards. The first analogy had the guy moving to the tiger when, in reality, it was the tiger who didn't like the words and attacked the guy for it. The 3rd party was added as the cage door needed to be opened. I felt it would be difficult for the tiger to use the keys without assistance due to the absence of opposable thumbs.
But you're analogy makes sense. The guy who used words was attacked by a simplistic animal who isn't capable of rational thought and is controlled by their emotions.
Wrong again, what you consider rational is really just society pussifying the weak to not have consequences for overstepping their bounds of challenging the stronger...but want should we expect, I mean this is a topic on a gun forum in America.
Maybe hearing that word over and over again was the problem.
Or maybe... the guy kicking at him while he was picking up his tea was just the gesture he needed to justify smashing the guy in the teeth with that delicious canned beverage. It had to be the teeth that breached the can, right? Lol, Okay!
No matter what, it’s more entertaining than most anything I’ve seen this month. This one will be around for a long time and reach epic status.
So what's the magic number on how many times a person can say a word you don't like before you are justified in hitting them in the face with a metal can?
Yeah I can’t answer that one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The law says it isn’t. So no...Do you feel the appropriate reaction to hearing a word you don't like is hitting someone in the head with a metal can?