Here's a good rebuttal to that article...
Yes, it is a good rebuttal. It also acknowledges something a number of people don't seem to understand. There are circumstances where blood can be drawn without consent and without a warrant. The article I posted did bring up an interesting point not mentioned in the rebuttal. Is there implied consent by having a CDL in Utah? The handbook put out by the states indicates there is and it is listed in the state law. Would that satisfy the "consent, warrant, or exigent circumstances" requirement?
https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53/Chapter3/53-3-S418.html