At some point in a man's life he has to decide whether "just following orders" blindly is acceptable against how a man should act. I guess he decided that things were so bad that a divergence was necessary.
I don't claim he shouldn't go through his due process for the crimes he committed, though. Just pointing out an irony to maybe put things in an interesting context.
Sorry Pacioli, but based on your logic we should have never had the Nuremberg trials. After all, they were just following orders. Right? It wasn't their fault.
When you sign on the dotted line to serve you take an oath to protect the United States of America from all enemies foreign AND domestic. Maybe he felt that he was fulfilling that oath by doing what he did, and if a trail by his peers proves that to be the case then he is a hero. Of course, he could also be found a trader. Either way, he deserves his day in court, just like you or anybody else.
As for the war(s), one doesn't have to support the occupation to support the troops. That is called blind patriotism and is a contributing factor to the dumbing down of our country. A true patriot will not blindly support a military occupation just because they are told that they are supposed to. How twisted things have become when being critical of your government makes people label you as Un-American? That is what every citizen is SUPPOSED TO DO. That is your duty, and maybe if we would have all lived up to that responsibility we wouldn't be having this conversation right now.
At some point in a man's life he has to decide whether "just following orders" blindly is acceptable against how a man should act.
I can think of another group of soldiers that was "just following orders."