Racism In White Americans Linked To Gun Ownership And Gun Control Opposition

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Grendal

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Feb 14, 2010
    987
    18
    Metairie
    - Racism In White Americans Linked To Gun Ownership And Gun Control Opposition



    A new study of symbolic racism among white American voters yielded strong links between latent biases toward blacks and increased favor of gun ownership and oppositions toward gun control.

    Published in the journal PLoS One, the study used voter data of white Americans that, after accounting for political ideology, income, and education, still revealed startling connections between racism and gun ownership. For every one point increase in symbolic racism — measured on a five-point scale — the chance someone had a gun in the home rose by 50 percent, and the chance the respondent supported policies that allowed people to carry concealed guns rose by 28 percent.

    Symbolic racism is less obvious than blatant or overt racism. It deals more with attitudes than actions, suggestions instead of slurs. The blatant racism of Jim Crow laws, which relegated blacks to the backs of buses and subjected them to many other inequalities, have been replaced, the researchers assert, by more discreet forms of discrimination. These are reflected in wide support for policies that statistically hinder blacks, such aslonger prison sentences, and opposition to programs that may benefit them, such aswelfare.

    Judging racism can be tricky, as it lends itself to interpretation quite frequently. Researchers formulated questions that they believed illuminated racist attitudes in respondents. One question, for instance, asked "How well does the word 'violent' describe most blacks?" The greater the relationship assigned to the two measures, the more the respondent was thought to be symbolically racist.

    "We were initially surprised that no one had studied this issue before,* said study co-author Dr. Dermot Lynott, from Lancaster University, in a statement. *However, the U.S. government cut research funding for gun-related research over decade and a half ago, so research in this area has been somewhat suppressed."

    The research team also found that for each one point increase in racism, the chances a respondent opposed legislation banning handguns at home rose by 27 percent. When controlling for current gun owners, that figure dropped to a statistically insignificant 17 percent. However, researchers say this drop is explained by the added self-interest that arises, as gun owners must now give up their own gun. Presumably, gun owners own their guns specifically because they believe guns should be in the home.

    Gun control debates are set against a bleak backdrop of school shootings, homicides, suicides, and gun violence in a country that routinely tops the list for most gun-related deaths in a given year. A study performed earlier this year found that the more guns a U.S. state owns directly relates to an increased homicide rate. Covering 30 years from 1981 to 2010, and controlling for a laundry list of variables, it is the largest and most comprehensive study to date examining homicide’s relationship to gun ownership.

    Each year, approximately 38,000 people suffer gun related deaths in the U.S. By 2015, total deaths related to guns are expected to exceed all traffic fatalities.

    "Coming from countries with strong gun control policies, and a 30-fold lower rate of gun-related homicides, we found the arguments for opposing gun control counterintuitive and somewhat illogical,* said co-author Dr. Kerry O’Brien, from the University of Manchester and Monash University, two British universities that, along with Lynott’s research headquarters, reside in a country where 6.2 people per 100,000 own a gun.

    In the U.S., that rate is 88 per 100,000.

    *For example, U.S. whites oppose gun control to a far greater extent than do blacks, but whites are actually more likely to kill themselves with their guns, than be killed by someone else,* O’Brien added. *Why would you keep them? So we decided to examine what social and psychological factors predict gun ownership and opposition to gun control."

    Part of the answer is simply freedom. Americans whose family is steeped in the traditions of southern conservatism tend to enjoy exercising their second amendment Constitutional right. Another is irrationality, or an ignorance of the facts. Gun ownership often proceeds under the assumption that one will be attacked. So people buy guns fearing someone else will use one on them, despite the supposed closeness of people inhabiting gun-heavy regions.

    The present study also found associations in their data between opposition to gun controls and conservatism, anti-government sentiment, party identification, and being from a southern state. Even controlling for these factors, the team found racism associated with gun control opposition and gun ownership.

    O’Brien suggests that further research into the issue should investigate why people commit certain biases and how those missteps could translate into larger consequences.

    "The study is a first step,* he said, *but there needs to be more investment in empirical research around how racial bias may influence people's policy decisions, particularly those policies that impact on the health and wellbeing of US citizens."


    http://www.medicaldaily.com/racism-...ontrol-opposition-261618#.UnUbceJJOFA.twitter
     

    JHenley17

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 21, 2013
    808
    16
    Prairieville
    ... more discreet forms of discrimination. These are reflected in wide support for policies that statistically hinder blacks, such aslonger prison sentences, and opposition to programs that may benefit them, such aswelfare.

    sounds like a pretty racist assumption to me.

    I also don't understand how people don't realize that criminals will use what is available to them.

    And while q0we're comparing gun violence per capita, how many murders happen in NYC, Chicago, or LA compared to, say, Ball, LA, where you'll be hard-pressed to find a home without several guns?

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I497 using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited:

    Leonidas

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Mar 4, 2010
    6,346
    38
    Slidell
    I am always intrigued at how one can be so full flowery prose surrounding purported facts, yet be hopelessly brain dead.
     

    Armed Mage

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 3, 2013
    495
    16
    Lafayette
    A new study shows that you can get the brain dead masses to believe anything as long as you state that it's what a new study shows.
     

    velociraptor

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2010
    180
    16
    Greater New Orleans Area
    When you start a study with a preconceived and/or biased notion it is very easy to obtain the data that supports that bias.

    The one key weakness I see is how you accurately measure racism and what do you define as racism?

    What is the definition of racism as per the study? This how they did it:
    Researchers formulated questions that they believed illuminated racist attitudes in respondents. One question, for instance, asked "How well does the word 'violent' describe most blacks?" The greater the relationship assigned to the two measures, the more the respondent was thought to be symbolically racist.

    Not exactly a had and fast yard stick there.
     

    JBE

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Aug 1, 2010
    2,431
    38
    Welsh, LA
    Obviously written by a New York elitist not of the Caucasian persuasion.

    Neither author is even American...

    Dr. O'Brien is from Australia and Dr. Lynott is from England.

    Researchers formulated questions that they believed illuminated racist attitudes in respondents.

    In other words, the questions were loaded and biased in such a way that would help support their findings.

    And this from the actual "study":

    Method

    The most recent data from the American National Election Study, a large representative US sample, was used to test relationships between racism, gun ownership, and opposition to gun control in US whites. Explanatory variables known to be related to gun ownership and gun control opposition (i.e., age, gender, education, income, conservatism, anti-government sentiment, southern vs. other states, political identification) were entered in logistic regression models, along with measures of racism, and the stereotype of blacks as violent. Outcome variables included; having a gun in the home, opposition to bans on handguns in the home, support for permits to carry concealed handguns.

    Looks like they took data from a survey that another organization previously conducted then attempted to interpret it themselves and plug it into their own models.

    No...this study is not "biased" at all...:rolleyes:
     

    VeedUp

    Well-Known Member
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    54   0   0
    Oct 15, 2007
    3,329
    38
    Destrehan, La.
    Maybe they should do a study on how many Negros make it out the hood and become educated working class Americans who still hate the whiteman.
     

    tim9lives

    Tim9
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 12, 2010
    1,675
    48
    New Orleans
    EVERYONE...and I do mean everyone...Has biases and can be defined as a racists to a certain degree.

    The Indian National who dislikes Pakistanis....The Chinese who still harbor angry feelings towards the Japanese...Muslims and Christians...Whites who are racist towards blacks....etc.

    And every one of those "victims of racism " in the above examples, also harbor racist feelings towards the other party. In other words...the Pakistanis are racists to the Indians and the Blacks harbor racists feelings towards the whites. Its just the way it is.
     
    Last edited:

    edman87k5

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    Oct 22, 2007
    2,625
    38
    Ventress, LA
    So being in favor of longer prison sentences and opposed to welfare makes you racist? I dont think it does. The idea that people that are for / agianst such things just proves that stereotypes are all based in fact!
    Saying you dont want minorities to have guns would make you racist. Saying you dont want criminals to to have guns would show you have common sense. Saying you dont want anyone to have guns makes you a liberal. Thinking you can keep people from doing illegal things by making more laws would make you stupid and a liberal!
     
    Top Bottom