Guate_shooter
LA CHP Instructor # 522
I always thought THE BEST safety ever designed was the Brain, but guess I was wrong all along.
I always thought THE BEST safety ever designed was the Brain, but guess I was wrong all along.
I guess that's one way of applauding S&W and Springfield. Glock is having to imitate THEIR features and upgrades to the polymer pistol platform
Get back to me when either of them file a successful lawsuit against Glock.
They'd be suing HK if it was for copying the polymer frame.
Actually, jut the opposite happened. S&W was sued by Glock and WON! When S&W jumped on the polymer band wagon, they broke several copyright infringements on their Sigma series and was proven that some Glock parts (when interchanged with the Smith) would function the Smith.
I suppose Smith could call it a win if they wanted to, but they did end up having to pay Glock between 5 & 8 million dollars, and agreed to impliment a slight design modification.
I meant it to say S&W was sued by Glock and Glock won the lawsuit... You were right in your statement.
The Glock 17 did not participate in those trials. It wasn't a matter of it being altered. The Contract Award was written to include a provision that after X amount of guns the pistols had to be produced and serviced at a US Factory. At the time Glock was a small company and had no intentions or ability to open a US Factory.
No doubt the US factory stipulation was the biggest factor. I bet he'd still refuse to to it today!
Wasn't it also true that the Beretta 92 & Sig 226 were basically a wash, IIRC- even though the Beretta became the M9 due to cost? So close that the Sig was given a gov't designation of it's own? I can't remember all of the story....
Not entirely. The SiG 226, which was their entry, never received an M-Designator. A short while later the P228 became the M11. I'm sure he would submit an entry if the competition were held today. In fact the 21SF came into existence because of the JCP Solicitation and there was a Manual Safety variant prepared also. The deciding factor between the Beretta and SiG guns was unit cost for the Pistol, 3 Magazines, and cleaning gear.
I can believe they still are continuing to manufacturing the Glock 37.
No doubt the US factory stipulation was the biggest factor. I bet he'd still refuse to to it today!
Wasn't it also true that the Beretta 92 & Sig 226 were basically a wash, IIRC- even though the Beretta became the M9 due to cost? So close that the Sig was given a gov't designation of it's own? I can't remember all of the story....
Glock has been making some frames in Ga. for several years and are now producing a few pistols for export. If Glock received a US Military contract the pistols would be made in the USA.
Really? I didn't know that....Do they currently sell them here, or just for export?
I guess the slides & other parts are still made in Austria?
They have been assembling imported parts with a Ga. made full size frame for a while and are supposed to be geared up to build complete guns for export.
That JCP thing sure did create a stir for something that never came to pass! Not to mention damn near everbody in the pistol biz came out with a new polymer .45 ACP service pistol. It did manage to sell a lot of pistols, I guess. I admit it: I fell for a desert sand, M&P 45 with the external safety on one of my "impulse buys". Maybe that was their idea, all along!