SPF SPF 11.5" Pistol or SBR upper $285 SHIPPED/22 lr kit-$150

[gunslinger06]

SPF SPF
BACK AGAIN DUE TO A DEADBEAT BUYER.

Reduced for quick sale-
NO BOLT/CARRIER
11.5" Upper complete with bolt/carrier/charging handle. Less than 100rds through it. Model 1S mfg. Runs great. Doesn't have a flashider. Bbl is threaded. $285 SHIPPING INCLUDED. I take ppl and trades. Only the upper is for sale.

I will add a cenier 22lr with 2 highcaps to this ppkg for and additional $150.

Prices are firm!!

THE BOLT/CARRIER IS IN THE PICS BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED.

 

[Narco]

Trades, what you looking for? Guns/Ammo?

 

[gunslinger06]

Lowers, acogs and aimpoints are high on the list.

 

[gunut]

Would this be considered class 3? Would I need the stamp to own it?
And could a suppressor be added to it?

 

[tmlowe]

Would this be considered class 3? Would I need the stamp to own it?
And could a suppressor be added to it?

Class 3 depends on how you want to use it. If you make a SBR, then yes, you will need a stamp. If pistol, no.

 

[gunslinger06]

The upper is not. You can put it on an AR pistol without a class 3 stamp. If you want to put it on a rifle you would need the stamp. As for a silencer, you can use one with this upper. I am not a class 3 guy but I think on the silencer you register and pay the class 3 fee at the point of purchase and can then move the silencer to whatever it will fit. With the SBR, the lower is still the weapon and you can put any sbr upper on it you want.

If I'm off base somebody please chime in. I'm sure there is a thread here explaining all about class III stuff.

 

[gunslinger06]

Thanks tmlowe, we must have been typing at the same time.

 

[gunut]

OK I think I understand. I would need a pistol lower for this upper to be legal. If I put this on my rifle it would be illegal.

 

[goodburbon]

OK I think I understand. I would need a pistol lower for this upper to be legal. If I put this on my rifle it would be illegal.

Yes, magic isn't it.

 

[gunut]

And if I put a silencer on goodburbon, everyone would be happy.

 

[gunslinger06]

You can always build a pistol out of a raw reciever.

 

[tmlowe]

In order to build a pistol out of a receiver, doesn't it need to be registered as a pistol? I remember the discussion here a while ago that if it was registered as a pistol you could build a pistol or a rifle but if it was registered as a rifle all you could build was a rifle. If that is the law, then a lower registered as a rifle but built as a pistol=illegal

 

[gunslinger06]

I thought so to but was corrected. If you buy a lower stripped it is neither rifle nor pistol and can be built either way legally. If it was purchased as a rifle, it must stay a rifle. If purchased as a pistol, I think(not sure on this) you can convert to a rifle(longer bbl and stock).

It would be technically illegal to buy a stripped lower, build it into a rifle and then convert to a pistol but would be nearly impossible to prove.

 

[tmlowe]

Doesn't it have to be registered as one or the other at time of purchase?

 

[gunslinger06]

My dealer registers(lists it on the yellow sheet) as "other".

 

[gunslinger06]

btt for reduced price.

 

[gunslinger06]

bump

 

[gunslinger06]

bump with pricing changes.

 

[glimmerman]

Doesn't it have to be registered as one or the other at time of purchase?

Did I miss something? When did GUN REGISTRATION begin???

 

[Richard in LA]

so given your prices, would you sell the BCG+CH for $100 to me?