This may be one of the dumbest arguments ever.
Are you seriously trying to imply that im a sexist neanderthal? Does that qualify as enlightened discourse in your circles?
Not in the least. I'm saying that him being blind is irrelevant to there being someone able to use a weapon on that house.
Agreed...since he was blind...Then it would be his wife's responsibility to protect the home and castle. Yet...at the same time...the article did say "he was legally blind without his eye-glasses"
So...considering the media's ability to sensationalize...one must question the term "blind" in the normal sense of the word.
Interesting. According to this websight, a legally blind person can drive. http://police.laws.com/illegal/legally-blind
Years ago, I asked my eye doctor what my vision would be on the 20/20 scale without glasses, he looked at me and said "legally blind". Not sure if he was joking or not.
I wonder what his choice is... 10 round shotgun?
This may be one of the dumbest arguments ever. More bullets is more better. But if you are comfortable with your wheelgun and shoot it well, more power to ya. 99% of the time you'll be fine. Six guys breaking into your house to violently rape your pregnant wife would represent the other 1%. Whether or not the 1% concerns you is a personal decision.