AgelessAnarchy
Well-Known Member
Ok, before I dive into this let me put out this disclaimer… opinions are like something else we all have. I am open to listen to them but I am not here to start a fight so lets play nice!
So I have been doing loads of research on all of the different pros and cons when shooting long distance with the .223 caliber rifle i am fully aware that this was not its intended purpose. Some people hate this round, others love it. Yes, I am also aware there are other calibers that will fit in the AR15 profile with better ballistic coefficients (IE: 6.5 Grendel) however this is my first AR build and I wanted something that has a lot of information to back it up. I am just dipping my feet into rifle shooting and I am totally jumping into the deep end. I have been shooting pistols for years but there are so many different things you have to take into consideration that are not really an in your face factor in pistol shooting. Things like Twist rate and bullet weight are not really a factor when it comes to pistols. At least at the distances I shoot.
Only issue I have really run into is there has been almost too much information out there. So I was kind of looking for some feedback.
Here is the current build.
-Lower-
S&W Receiver
Magpull PRS Stock
Wilson Combat 2 Stage drop in Match Trigger
DPMS Panther Grip
-Upper-
Rock River 20” SS Free Floating Varmint Barrel, chambered in 5.56 with a 1/8 Twist
DPMS Flat top upper
Wilson Combat 5.56 NATO BCA
Harris Bi-pod
I know or at least have read that for competition its better to shoot .223 chambered in .223 not 5.56. but the second part I purchased after the receiver was the barrel and that was before I read about this statement so I have to make due with what I have there.
Now to the part where I am at info overload… twist rate to bullet weight
The manufacturer doesn’t state any suggested weights or even a max weight. Different sources on the net have stated anywhere from 55>62 to 55>80 for the 1/8 twist.
Obviously if its to heavy it will never stabilize and if its to light you wont maintain accuracy at the upper range capabilities of the .223 caliber specifically at 600 yards.
My top contender right now is the 69g Serria Matchkings because I can still load them to the 2.26 OAL and not have issues with proper feeding. Also plenty of people use them. But just because these are the norm does not mean something better has not come out. My question is to the more experienced rifle shooters. Is the 69g going to be to light to maintain accurate groups at 600 yards with average/normal wind conditions? There is a lot of conflicting info out there. That’s why I am asking for feedback from some of the FPR shooters in our area. The other thing I haven’t even begun to look at yet is optics because honestly I don’t even know where to start so I am totally open to suggestions here for a starting place.
Looking forward to the feed back.
So I have been doing loads of research on all of the different pros and cons when shooting long distance with the .223 caliber rifle i am fully aware that this was not its intended purpose. Some people hate this round, others love it. Yes, I am also aware there are other calibers that will fit in the AR15 profile with better ballistic coefficients (IE: 6.5 Grendel) however this is my first AR build and I wanted something that has a lot of information to back it up. I am just dipping my feet into rifle shooting and I am totally jumping into the deep end. I have been shooting pistols for years but there are so many different things you have to take into consideration that are not really an in your face factor in pistol shooting. Things like Twist rate and bullet weight are not really a factor when it comes to pistols. At least at the distances I shoot.
Only issue I have really run into is there has been almost too much information out there. So I was kind of looking for some feedback.
Here is the current build.
-Lower-
S&W Receiver
Magpull PRS Stock
Wilson Combat 2 Stage drop in Match Trigger
DPMS Panther Grip
-Upper-
Rock River 20” SS Free Floating Varmint Barrel, chambered in 5.56 with a 1/8 Twist
DPMS Flat top upper
Wilson Combat 5.56 NATO BCA
Harris Bi-pod
I know or at least have read that for competition its better to shoot .223 chambered in .223 not 5.56. but the second part I purchased after the receiver was the barrel and that was before I read about this statement so I have to make due with what I have there.
Now to the part where I am at info overload… twist rate to bullet weight
The manufacturer doesn’t state any suggested weights or even a max weight. Different sources on the net have stated anywhere from 55>62 to 55>80 for the 1/8 twist.
Obviously if its to heavy it will never stabilize and if its to light you wont maintain accuracy at the upper range capabilities of the .223 caliber specifically at 600 yards.
My top contender right now is the 69g Serria Matchkings because I can still load them to the 2.26 OAL and not have issues with proper feeding. Also plenty of people use them. But just because these are the norm does not mean something better has not come out. My question is to the more experienced rifle shooters. Is the 69g going to be to light to maintain accurate groups at 600 yards with average/normal wind conditions? There is a lot of conflicting info out there. That’s why I am asking for feedback from some of the FPR shooters in our area. The other thing I haven’t even begun to look at yet is optics because honestly I don’t even know where to start so I am totally open to suggestions here for a starting place.
Looking forward to the feed back.