That I remain here is a sure sign of my own stupidity -curiousity and the cat ...damnit.
We can always help you get smart. I do have access to the ban button if that's what you wish. I'm just sayin...
That I remain here is a sure sign of my own stupidity -curiousity and the cat ...damnit.
As well they should have! There are actually folks (beyond this forum) that have a thorough understanding of the "gaming" industry. Those that would dismiss the culpabillity of specific miltary based video "games" (stacked up in here like cord wood) are simply uninformed, opinionated bystanders watching something they cannot (or will not) understand.
Fact: DARPA taps "game" developers for their AI algorithms to create imbalance in DoD simulated war games - the disruption is used to train soldiers for real-world battle. AI is used to break predictable patterns in a game (war scenario), then the disruption AI is applied to a second game. The two-game approach is designed to validate that an AI methodology can be extended beyond a single video game and could potentially be applied to advanced DoD wargaming scenarios.
Fact: All the major "players are in the game" -Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin, EpiSci, Blue Wave, on and on.
Check out AlphaDogFight trials.
Well...of course they tap game developers. It would be foolish not to. Why would you start from scratch when the game developers have already done the hard part?
Bottom line -there's likely an intensive and specific training session (of some sort, LOL) going on in your kid's bedroom (or yours, God help you) and you payed good money for it.
You forgot to post the link between the facts and the bottom line. Boeing makes the 737 Max. They also make the C-17 Globemaster. But it would be a stretch to say that someone training to fly the 737 Max is actually training to fly combat missions just because Boeing does business in multiple industries.