So as I understand it effective this coming Friday, 5/10, any private sale or trade between 2 BayouShooter members will fall under the new rule.
Also, as I understand it a seller/buyer/trade where the parties go to an FFL to complete the deal does NOT satisfy the seller’s responsibility, as the seller must 1) obtain an FFL AND 2) complete a background check. Although it would make sense that if the ATF’s real goal was to ensure all transferees undergo a background check the TRUE goal is to criminalize, as felons, as many gun owners as it can and thus confiscate their firearms.
This Friday. In 5 days. A board like BS is a great resource to the ATF in IDing honest folks who are selling/trading firearms. Let’s hope a TRO is issued by Friday. If you’re not already a member of GOA, the Second Amendment Foundation, or the Firearms Policy Coalition it may be time to sign up. Under the braces rule members were exempted from the rule pending final legal resolution.
So as I understand it effective this coming Friday, 5/10, any private sale or trade between 2 BayouShooter members will fall under the new rule.
Also, as I understand it a seller/buyer/trade where the parties go to an FFL to complete the deal does NOT satisfy the seller’s responsibility, as the seller must 1) obtain an FFL AND 2) complete a background check. Although it would make sense that if the ATF’s real goal was to ensure all transferees undergo a background check the TRUE goal is to criminalize, as felons, as many gun owners as it can and thus confiscate their firearms.
This Friday. In 5 days. A board like BS is a great resource to the ATF in IDing honest folks who are selling/trading firearms. Let’s hope a TRO is issued by Friday. If you’re not already a member of GOA, the Second Amendment Foundation, or the Firearms Policy Coalition it may be time to sign up. Under the braces rule members were exempted from the rule pending final legal resolution.
Man Strick, I really don’t want to be the bubble buster here, but did you not read the retroactive clause in that rule?Correction: The Justice Department submitted its proposed rule to the Federal Register on 4/11, but it was not actually “published” until 4/19. So we don’t actually lose our rights until 5/20, NOT 5/10! WHOO HOO!!!
Man Strick, I really don’t want to be the bubble buster here, but did you not read the retroactive clause in that rule?
When you find it, post the relevant section for the rest of us.
(Translation: I'm too lazy to do it myself )
When you find it, post the relevant section for the rest of us.
(Translation: I'm too lazy to do it myself )
Quoting your shorter post to save the bandwidth. Just wanted to say, regarding your last paragraph here, I’ve always thought of you as one of the smartest guys I know and I don’t mean that in a corn pop kind of way. Carry on brother.Don’t hold your breath, this document is a beast! But I’ll find it… keep you posted.