CloudStrife
Why so serious?
How would he be defending the Constititution and US if he quit?
You forget that TOTUS is among the enemies McChrystal was sworn to defend us against. Having the balls to speak out against him while on duty was a frontal assault. If McChrystal "quit then opened his mouth" the state-run media would have gone into full damage-control mode and blown him off as just another disgruntled ex-employee. Now this is front-page news, and 0sama has been damaged even further, coming across as a panty-waist who can't handle criticism.Then he should have quit and then opened his mouth.
Elections have consequences and this is one of them. Among the MANY others we are seeing daily.
To those who are applauding the general for "speaking his mind" to Rolling Stoned, think about where those comments lead. Do you really want a military that is not firmly under civilian control? NOT answerable to Commander in Chief (no matter who he/she may be), for ALL matters?
Didn't think so.
Given the choice of a military serving the Constitution, or serving the currentTo those who are applauding the general for "speaking his mind" to Rolling Stoned, think about where those comments lead. Do you really want a military that is not firmly under civilian control? NOT answerable to Commander in Chief (no matter who he/she may be), for ALL matters?
Michael Savage perhaps said it best:
"The man who has spent most of his life defending America has been fired by the man who spent most of his life stapling fliers to telephone poles in Chicago."
How true.
But who is the president answering to?
Given the choice of a military serving the Constitution, or serving the currentadministrationregime who, in my opinion, IS THE ENEMY, I'd indeed take the military. Each and every thing this regime does is counter to the Constitution, freedom, national security, and our nation's very existence. The last thing we need is a military blindly following that enemy's orders. Remember the "domestic" part of the whole "enemies" thing, and look no farther than DC to see it in the flesh.
Has anyone considered maybe the guy did this whole thing on purpose to alert certain groups in the American populus that they are being led by a group of hopeless amateurs, with a complete dud for Commander-In-Chief?
I wouldn't rule this out.
I can't see any other reason to even give an interview to a degenerate, drug-culture magazine such as Rolling Stone....
Term limits are not the answer. That does nothing but limit our choices each election. The answer to our problems is educated and sensible voters. Without that, term limits or not, the crap would be put into office again and again.
Has anyone considered maybe the guy did this whole thing on purpose to alert certain groups in the American populus that they are being led by a group of hopeless amateurs, with a complete dud for Commander-In-Chief?
I wouldn't rule this out.
I can't see any other reason to even give an interview to a degenerate, drug-culture magazine such as Rolling Stone....