No that's foolish, dangerous and if caught without harming anyone quite expensive.
Missouri with concealed carry, no permit required
- Thread starter Magdump
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
No that's foolish, dangerous and if caught without harming anyone quite expensive.
No some speed limits are so moronicly under posted for the average vehicles on the road today that the only genuine purpose could be is revenue production.
Your comments make you sound anti-freedom. I don't care what you call me but I am not some hippie and I'm far from anti-cop.
I linked an article and gave a pretty reasonable explanation of my opinion several months back. I would do it again if I thought you had a genuine interest.
- - - Updated - - -
Only by people with preconceived notions who refuse to listen to reason.
And I could go dig back up research where speed differentials decrease as speed limits increase causing less accidents. But hey I just some dirtbag cop hatter who somehow manages to show up to prayer services for slain officers who will look you in the eye shake your hand and thank you for your service. But some how because I expect the best from the police in best and free-est country in the world, I'm a cop hatter.
Last edited:
Yeah I guess my moral compass and my belief in our freedoms are preconceived notions.
Given your past posts on certain topics, I'd say they are preconceived notions. Especially in regards to carry laws. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this "discussion."
But the difference between my preconceived notions as it relates to our rule of law is rooted directly in our founding documents. Something many of us would consider unwavering truth. Your preconceived notions seem to be based more on what is the law as of today, bubbas are the scum of the earth. And of course "DAVE is the most awesomest person ever."
Well, yea... it's 2016, not 1776. Bubba Redneck and his pals aren't the scum of the Earth, but they are in the mouth breathing group that makes this country look so bad.
Sucking up to me won't get you a promotion in the fanclub.
Unwavering truth doesn't care what year it is its truth. I can explain my opinions all day long and why those are my opinions but If you don't understand that the founding structure of government and the first 10 amendments were designed not to give you the rights you already had but to bind the government's hands from interfering in those rights, you and I will sometimes see eye to eye and sometimes we won't. See your right freedom of speech, religion, assembly, self defense, privacy, movement, ect, ect. were not created in the bill of rights the bill of rights bound the government from interfering in your free excercising of those rights.
And we can agree bubba can be embarrassing for us from time to time.
Last edited:
I'm not sure if that's tongue in cheek or a put down, either way I honestly could care less so long as you understand that is the ultimate standard I compare government interaction to.
Another point I think is sorely missed this isn't just about me and bubba shoving our pea shooters in our pants and walking around without our permission slips.
Last edited:
JoeLiberty
Well-Known Member
This is about the third time I've asked this, but again, if there's no reason to believe the guy has committed a crime, or is about to commit a crime, why does he NEED to be stopped?? Because he is black, or I'm sorry, "a young Dindu Nuffins" is not a good reason. Are you from that Basket of Deplorables?
I almost missed that you changed your avatar. That's funny.
