Unbelivable. Hope this link works.
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96138
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96138
Time to start killing ****!
I usually take Worldnet with a grain of salt...so,okay, how about a second report on the same story?
http://sev.prnewswire.com/art/20090424/NY0498524042009-1.html
Didn't Oprah call him the Messiah?
I don't know, but Sean Hannity does.
From your comments must I assume you consider the New York Times a bastion of journalistic credibility?
I believe he calls him the Anointed One. From your comments must I assume you consider the New York Times a bastion of journalistic credibility?
Nope, I generally don't trust much of any news outlet. I watch (or check webites) from Fox, CNN, MSNBC, BBC to get a general idea of what is going on and try to think objectively about what I read.
Is someone this nutty out there? Probably. Is it news? Probably not. Is it something that a majority of Americans think is a great idea? Again probably not. IMO the story and idea are just silly. It reeks of sensationalism and doesn't require much from me.
OK, i know you all want to see him crucified.
Since we are debating it, here is a much better story on the subject. Lots more info on the artists intent:
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS190871+24-Apr-2009+PRN20090424
By the news stories and according to the reuters story, the artist is achieving what he wanted "reflecting the personal opinions and emotions of the viewer."
Since we are debating it, here is a much better story on the subject. Lots more info on the artists intent:
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS190871+24-Apr-2009+PRN20090424
By the news stories and according to the reuters story, the artist is achieving what he wanted "reflecting the personal opinions and emotions of the viewer."