machinedrummer
Well-Known Member
Our bus driver would keep the soft cases in front of the bus. We were able to re-do the stocks and blue in shop class. Where have all the good times gone??
So how much in legal fees do you think it will cost to be the test case here??????This ordinance or law has not been tested under strict scrutiny yet. It would be hard for the "state" to justify 1000' for public safety.
Keaster carry right on. Probably not the crazy thing some of those naked bike rider have keastered.I guess the prison wallet would be an option in the naked bike parade for CC.
I would love to see that day. I will refer back to the fact we have a SCOTUS being steered center instead of towards the constitution.First off the law is flawed in many ways. First, Sec. 54-342. - Illegal possession of weapons at demonstrations. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person, other than a law enforcement officer, to have in his possession or to have in any vehicle at a point within 1,000 feet of a demonstration at a public place any weapon after having first been advised by a law enforcement officer that a demonstration was taking place at a public place and after having been ordered by such officer to remove himself from the proscribed area until such time as he no longer is in possession of any weapon. This section shall not apply to any person in possession of any weapon in his private dwelling or place of business.
In Louisiana your vehicle is an extension of your home. So the law is flawed, plain and simple.
Secondly, Since when does a "privilege" off attending a parade (a gathering for for entertainment purposes) supersede the 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms? Is there "equal justice under the law" or not?
I don't expect anyone to actually answer the question and most who would would spout off more anti-constitutional legal rhetoric anyway. I am just putting it out there. What we need is laws that don't conflict with the constitution or with each other for that matter.
I would love to see that day. I will refer back to the fact we have a SCOTUS being steered center instead of towards the constitution.
So how much in legal fees do you think it will cost to be the test case here??????
As an aside, with 37 years of criminal defense practice under my belt and a knowledge of both the 4th circuit and LASC, I'll bet you any amount of money that this law will pass the strict scrutiny test.
Couldn’t agree moreYes, even with newly appointed so-called conservative judges they still treat the constitution like it was a historical document rather than the supreme law of the land. Sad.
Oh, the irony. The piece of sh*! gang banging murderous thugs that have stolen firearms tucked in there pants ghetto style. You know that ones that own the streets of New Orleans as if it were the wild, wild West. They shoot the place up on a seemingly daily basis. Were probably roaming around the French Quarter un-challenged. But the guy open carrying is the threat?
In Louisiana your vehicle is an extension of your home. So the law is flawed, plain and simple.
Yeah...them lazy SOB's do nothing about the guns in the French Quarter. Well...nothing except this:
https://nopdnews.com/post/june-2019/nopd-arrests-suspect-for-illegal-gun-possession-in/
Oh, and this:
https://nopdnews.com/post/may-2019/arrested-suspect-arrested-for-illegal-possession-o/
Then there's this:
https://nopdnews.com/post/may-2019/nopd-arrests-subject-on-illegal-gun-possession-cha/
And I found this:
https://nopdnews.com/post/may-2019/nopd-arrests-suspect-for-illegal-firearm-posse-(1)/
But that's it because they can't arrest someone with out a press release. And it's not like they get a lot of calls for service. So they just lazy.
*gulp*
Anyone want to tell him?