This thread has been closed. If anyone has an issue or a question regarding this, you are welcome to pm me directly.
At this point, you two had come to an agreement. You would pay a deposit to hold it and would pay the balance when you met in person. Based on your texts, you were already coming to BR on Thursday. You moved the trip up for the sale. Not being able to meet today does not mean you no longer have business in the area.
Here you are saying you cannot complete the deal because you cannot make it to Baton Rouge.
You may want to check the terms of service. The bank is usually not involved in transactions through apps like cashapp.
The $600 was not simply to hold the gun. The $600 was part of the purchase price with the balance due upon your meeting.
As stated, the guns in both pictures are the same gun. The fading/wear of the letters show that as the fading/wear is in the same spot in each picture. The only difference between the two is the lighting. And even if they were different guns, you are buying a make and model, not a specific gun with a specific serial number. As long as the gun you are presented with matches the description, the seller is good to go.
Neither your credentials or your race have any bearing on this issue.
Again, the $600 was part of the purchase. It was not simply a hold.
Wear was not a factor until this post.
This is not mentioned in the conversation. You had plans to meet today but nothing was said about the deposit having an expiration.
He had buyers interested in paying a certain price. If those other buyers are only willing to pay less than that price, why should he nave a financial loss after you backed out of the deal? I can't say I see it as unfair for the difference to come from the deposit as it was your actions, not his, that lowered the price others were willing to pay.
No, you chose to make this post. He was working. It's unfair to not give him time to respond.
It's the same gun under different lighting.
Now you're adding the wear as a reason for backing out of the deal even though you didn't notice the imagined wear until well after backing out. This is why people are saying you are changing your story.
He's also entitled to recoup any loss due to your actions. This right here is why people have a first come first serve policy and despise holding items.
I'm sure the user would be highly reluctant to do business with you as well. In fact, I'd bet there are a number of users on here you won't have to worry about doing business with.
This issue is a civil matter and does not involve this board. Based on your repeating false claims you should discuss the issue directly with the other party rather than through the board.
At this point, you two had come to an agreement. You would pay a deposit to hold it and would pay the balance when you met in person. Based on your texts, you were already coming to BR on Thursday. You moved the trip up for the sale. Not being able to meet today does not mean you no longer have business in the area.
Here you are saying you cannot complete the deal because you cannot make it to Baton Rouge.
You may want to check the terms of service. The bank is usually not involved in transactions through apps like cashapp.
The $600 was not simply to hold the gun. The $600 was part of the purchase price with the balance due upon your meeting.
As stated, the guns in both pictures are the same gun. The fading/wear of the letters show that as the fading/wear is in the same spot in each picture. The only difference between the two is the lighting. And even if they were different guns, you are buying a make and model, not a specific gun with a specific serial number. As long as the gun you are presented with matches the description, the seller is good to go.
Neither your credentials or your race have any bearing on this issue.
Again, the $600 was part of the purchase. It was not simply a hold.
Wear was not a factor until this post.
This is not mentioned in the conversation. You had plans to meet today but nothing was said about the deposit having an expiration.
He had buyers interested in paying a certain price. If those other buyers are only willing to pay less than that price, why should he nave a financial loss after you backed out of the deal? I can't say I see it as unfair for the difference to come from the deposit as it was your actions, not his, that lowered the price others were willing to pay.
No, you chose to make this post. He was working. It's unfair to not give him time to respond.
It's the same gun under different lighting.
Now you're adding the wear as a reason for backing out of the deal even though you didn't notice the imagined wear until well after backing out. This is why people are saying you are changing your story.
He's also entitled to recoup any loss due to your actions. This right here is why people have a first come first serve policy and despise holding items.
I'm sure the user would be highly reluctant to do business with you as well. In fact, I'd bet there are a number of users on here you won't have to worry about doing business with.
This issue is a civil matter and does not involve this board. Based on your repeating false claims you should discuss the issue directly with the other party rather than through the board.
