You asked the question in a public forum so I it is everybody's lane. If it was meant to be a private question, you have the option of asking it in private. And based on your reply, my speculation was spot on. If his interpretation of the law is correct, his being a lawyer or not is irrelevant. If he is a lawyer, his interpretation could be wrong. Not all lawyers are right all of the time. Not all non-lawyers are wrong all of the time.
And when I refer to relevant and irrelevant, I speak in the context of the topic of discussion. That information may be relevant or irrelevant to you personally.
Oh well excuse me for assuming that it would not be confusing to some people. If I quote a post and add the word “YOU”, I’m directing it at that person. Thanks for the lesson on lawyers and who is right and not right sometimes, you surely cleared it up for me. You seem to know an awful lot about everything so do you know if Nathan is a lawyer? That was the original question but if you would like to argue and turn this into a **** show I’m game. To be a moderator you are very argumentative and I bet once someone beats you at your own game you will fall back on the rules that you do not follow. With that being said, if you don’t know the answer to the original question then I guess you should have nothing else to add.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro