You guys who are talking about how to prove your ownership to the arresting officer - you're missing one thing. The cop is committing armed robbery, and both he and you know it. It doesn't matter what evidence you present. It doesn't matter what laws you cite. The cop has decided to commit armed robbery, and (s)he will carry through no matter what you do unless you can convince him/her that you have recorded the transaction, and they can't access the recording.
Remember they have a gun, and you are disarmed. They can kill you and get away with it it their word is the only witness. That's why you surrender your gun. You have no legal recourse. If you try to get an attorney to get your gun back it's your word against the cop's. He can keep your gun, because a jury has to accept the word of a cop over yours. If you dispute the matter with the cop he can arrest you and take you to jail. That's why we acquiesce.
I'm editing this to add that I'm not posting this to bash police. Hell they're probably the only reason my home wasn't robbed during Katrina. No, I'm just pointing out the reality of the case presented above.
Remember they have a gun, and you are disarmed. They can kill you and get away with it it their word is the only witness. That's why you surrender your gun. You have no legal recourse. If you try to get an attorney to get your gun back it's your word against the cop's. He can keep your gun, because a jury has to accept the word of a cop over yours. If you dispute the matter with the cop he can arrest you and take you to jail. That's why we acquiesce.
I'm editing this to add that I'm not posting this to bash police. Hell they're probably the only reason my home wasn't robbed during Katrina. No, I'm just pointing out the reality of the case presented above.
Last edited: