As an aside, the press is labeling it a "motorcycle gang" that attacked him; riders get labelled as it is without conjuring up gang related images.
Suppose it sells better than saying a disorganized group of two-wheeled idiots.
Guy with the SUV had the wrong break over angle and lack of a good set of steel bumpers. He needs to upgrade to something of this nature.
Lol you guys are something else. I was there and saw everything! He merged into the pack of close to 1000 bikes when he could have just stayed at the intersection. And what you don't see in the vid is him hitting a guy and keep driving.. Then everyone tried slowing him down(start of the vid) so he hits another rider.. Then runs 4 bikes down! You douches say what you want but just like the media you don't know ****!
im the idiot huh? lmfao they were slowing him down because he hit someone before the vid!!! kept driving like it was nothing. this idiot should NEVER have leaked the vid and thats why you havent seen anymore vids of it...there are vids of the first hit and run and those are being turned over to the cops to get this straitened out.
i dont talk to cops
last response from me...this was an annual and organized ride..what you see in the vid is after he already hit someone and kept driving.
my point is, if im driving with my wife and infant kid and see group of hundreds of bikes..there would be no way in hell id force a merge with the pack..(thats just plain common sense) the blame does go on both sides for the way it unfolded but the start of the whole ordeal was solely on the suv. force yourself in a pack of bikes..hit one and keep driving.. then hit another when they try to get you pulled over (for NOT stopping) and then running down 4 and paralizing one of them! i can careless about how this or that doesnt control the roads..if you have a brain use it..specially with your family in the car.
And here's a link to supposedly more videos from this same group of riders earlier in the day before the land rover ordeal: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3cd_1380579664
Wow some people seem to think that disobeying traffic laws gives the other drivers free reign to take them out, eh? "They ran red lights and drove like idiots, so since I go to church and have my CCW I am just gonna open fire on em..."
The Range Rover driver should be charged with hit and run and possibly attempted murder. After the first incident the bikers should have called the police on the Range Rover driver but instead they tried to institute a little vigilante justice. The bikers were wrong in how they were riding, and they were wrong to try to take justice in their own hands. That still doesn't make them deserve the death penalty. I know many readers here have expressed their disgust at motorcycles in general, and look for an excuse to turn their "I just want to open my door on the bastards and knock them off that damn thing" into "Kill all the evil sonsabunches!" but in this case the Rover driver was the one who took it too far.
Wow some people seem to think that disobeying traffic laws gives the other drivers free reign to take them out, eh? "They ran red lights and drove like idiots, so since I go to church and have my CCW I am just gonna open fire on em...".
Respectfully, I don't think you are correctly playing Connect the Dots. Dude has his wife and kid in the car and was being threatened by some scary individuals. The reality is he should be given a medal for not taking out at least 30 bikers.Wow some people seem to think that disobeying traffic laws gives the other drivers free reign to take them out, eh? "They ran red lights and drove like idiots, so since I go to church and have my CCW I am just gonna open fire on em..."
The Range Rover driver should be charged with hit and run and possibly attempted murder. After the first incident the bikers should have called the police on the Range Rover driver but instead they tried to institute a little vigilante justice. The bikers were wrong in how they were riding, and they were wrong to try to take justice in their own hands. That still doesn't make them deserve the death penalty. I know many readers here have expressed their disgust at motorcycles in general, and look for an excuse to turn their "I just want to open my door on the bastards and knock them off that damn thing" into "Kill all the evil sonsabunches!" but in this case the Rover driver was the one who took it too far.
There is a far more important lesson that needs to be articulated here by LE & DA's around the country. Which is; If this man, started throwing lead, and actually started killing these threats; would he have been completely justified in his actions?
I am not interested with hearing phony media pundits and social media pseudo-experts opinions. I want as many major city DA's to go on record stating that had this man had a firearm for self defense, and actually used it lethally, they would not ever prosecute.
And on top of that, I would want them to add that he would/should not be subjected to any civil litigation either (thought that is a stretch).
All I hear is crickets thus far?!?!
Respectfully, I don't think you are correctly playing Connect the Dots. Dude has his wife and kid in the car and was being threatened by some scary individuals. The reality is he should be given a medal for not taking out at least 30 bikers.
Wow some people seem to think that disobeying traffic laws gives the other drivers free reign to take them out, eh? "They ran red lights and drove like idiots, so since I go to church and have my CCW I am just gonna open fire on em..."
The Range Rover driver should be charged with hit and run and possibly attempted murder. After the first incident the bikers should have called the police on the Range Rover driver but instead they tried to institute a little vigilante justice. The bikers were wrong in how they were riding, and they were wrong to try to take justice in their own hands. That still doesn't make them deserve the death penalty. I know many readers here have expressed their disgust at motorcycles in general, and look for an excuse to turn their "I just want to open my door on the bastards and knock them off that damn thing" into "Kill all the evil sonsabunches!" but in this case the Rover driver was the one who took it too far.
When seconds count, the police are just minutes away. I wish the SUV driver would have killed a few (or all) of the idiots... Maybe thin out thier gene pool. He's a much nicer guy than I am.What strikes me is that, assuming the guy in the SUV was on the phone with 911 as this unfolded, and he's a retard if he wasn't, is in all those miles, in all that time, not one police car could intercept this on the freeway? In all that distance, there wasn't 1 police car that could have followed this and been there at the end? And in this city, the mayor says I don't have the right to protect myself as I see fit, I need to leave that to the police?
COME ON!
There is a far more important lesson that needs to be articulated here by LE & DA's around the country. Which is; If this man, started throwing lead, and actually started killing these threats; would he have been completely justified in his actions?
I am not interested with hearing phony media pundits and social media pseudo-experts opinions. I want as many major city DA's to go on record stating that had this man had a firearm for self defense, and actually used it lethally, they would not ever prosecute.
And on top of that, I would want them to add that he would/should not be subjected to any civil litigation either (though that is a stretch).
All I hear is crickets thus far?!?!