I don't have anything registered with the NFA. The NFA is completely void of common sense. It is beyond me why someone would give the government money for a constitutional right. Not sure what your point was with all the questions."...in connection with that attempt at an over reach." Do you have any registered items? Do you consider the NFA itself to be an over reach or do you view the NFA good common sense legislation?
Personally, I do not believe SBR's should be regulated in any way beyond that of an "ordinary" rifle or pistol. And silencers shouldn't be regulated at all. I consider the NFA to be an over reach. Therefore, it is difficult for me to understand why people are so upset that someone, who would have been paying $200 to sbr a weapon absent the brace rule, has elected to sbr that weapon for free. What is it about giving the government money that make one over reach acceptable?