Nolacopusmc
*Banned*
******** on privilege. It is a right as defined by the men that founded this country. Has the state perverted the intent in an unconstitutional way? Yes. Does that mean it isn't a right, NOT TO BE INFRINGED? No, it does not. It means we have a law on the books that common sense tells you is unconstitutional.
I understand why the state mandates the course, making carry a "privilege" for the general public interest, but blind enforcement of the law against citizens with no criminal history is, on its face, plainly unconstitutional.
Right or wrong, it is.
It is still a privilege.
Just because you or anyone else doesn't like, does not change the fact that it is reality. We shouldn't have to fill out paperworj for guns, silencers, full auto, whatever, but we do.
We shouldn't have to get a "license" to drive on roads our tax dollars pay for, but we do.
We shouldn't have to conform to a lot of things, but we do.
The truth is, despite the fact that it shouldn't be, it is. the ******** that Louisiana Shooter is pulling, besides clouding the water for those less informed is ignorant, but we have come to expect that from him.
Fact is, FL non-resident is no longer honored, and neither is/will Utah. Right or wrong, that is a fact. If Louisiana Shooter feels it is such an injustice, then he can use his frosted flakes boxtop lawyer degree to argue it up to the supreme court.
Still does not change he fact that carrying under the misconception that you have a valid non-resident FL license severely increases your chance of arrest, and will be devastating for you in civil court following a shooting.