dixiejarhead
Well-Known Member
Federal crimes though, so that becomes moot, right? Do I misunderstand how this proceeds?
No federal crime for murder. It's state jurisdiction.
Federal crimes though, so that becomes moot, right? Do I misunderstand how this proceeds?
Doesn't matter. He can be tried AS AN AMERICAN citizen under a federal terrorism charge, which can result in the death penalty.
I assumed there'd be some Federal charges. I know murder is specifically a State charge, but I assume there are Federal charges for the explosives, illegal guns, and terrorist ****, at the least, that'd be good for an execution.No federal crime for murder. It's state jurisdiction.
Federal crimes though, so that becomes moot, right? Do I misunderstand how this proceeds?
I assumed there'd be some Federal charges. I know murder is specifically a State charge, but I assume there are Federal charges for the explosives, illegal guns, and terrorist ****, at the least, that'd be good for an execution.
Digging up the googles to see if Federal charges are planned, (though I understand the previous accuracy of 'the media' has been nothing short of astounding...) I get a few mentions of it. Federal prosecutors... Federal charges...
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...7656_1_boston-marathon-dagestan-other-attacks
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2013/04/201342214238512114.html
Though no one has any information on /what/ charges are likely obviously. I guess we'll find out in the coming days, if not today.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ132/html/PLAW-104publ132.htm
Can any law readers translate the Antiterrorism and Death Penalty Act of 1996? Is it a yea or nay ?
let the people of Massivetwoshits pay for his lifetime of jail and medical rehabilitation. They voted out the death penalty in 1984, let them have him. Part of the reason why I don't feel sorry for ANYONE that remains in such a state if they are conservative. They give their money to that system then want me to feel sorry for them? Screw them! Time for them to vote with their feet, or put their money where their mouth is.Though life in jail isn't anything to scoff at, I'd be a little disappointed if we don't execute the guy.
"Conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction against persons, property of the United States, resulting in death."
He's the White House statement. The way Carney puts it, it sure doesn't sound like the death penalty is on the table, anyway.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/04/22/carney_boston_bomber_will_not_be_charged_as_enemy_combatant.html
Numerous news orgs now saying it's the Feds' case (WMD charges)- and that the death penalty is at least a possibility.
Still looking for nexus. I don't see it. If they charge fed, I think a good lawyer will beat it. Everyone of the cases that are active or previously carried out involved interstate crimes, or crimes committed on federal properties (murrah building in OKC etc) or against federal employees, witness protection members etc.
Weren't these so called "new terror" charges a result of the last anti-terroism statute the Congress passed. The Patriot Act or whatnot?
They may be, I am not certain. I am checking and waiting to see what they file. If it is the case, everyone needs to be VERY worried.....