The reason LEOs won't get involved in a discussion like this is because when they try to present the facts (as opposed to what some vocal folks THINK should be the case), they get jumped on, called jack-booted thugs, etc.
I had this happen to me on GlockTalk. ----SNIP----But when I tried to point out the fact that open carry was in general a bad idea, you would have thought I urinated on the flag. I know most of you mean well, and are genuinely interested in some hard information. But there's no way I'm going to get involved in that sort of crap again. The few ruin it for the many.
LSP,
I followed that thread too. Amazing how people want to shoot the messanger.
Your points on the real world reaction of the police were right on IMHO.
Those people ignore the real world with criminals ... and open carry in their sight is just stupid. Cops also look at open carry and overreact as it's not customary in a rural stranger rich place. Thats the real gripe the negative posters were getting at. That and the fact they think people objecting to their OC is unjust.
I don't know if I've ever writen this before but I believe the Fact is, open carry has always been looked at as threatening even in the wild west. With the political climate now in LA, it might get you accidentally shot by a fellow good guy. Stupid.
The real value of the law these days as I see it is that, in urban areas, to make any chance exposure of your carry weapon a legal act by there being no issue transitioning from open to concealed and back. That's a great tool for the pro 2A movement and a real stick in the eye of the Brady Nazis statistic mongers.
Don't let internet cowboys quiet you either. I'm sure the majority of them are in fact nerds, too young and blind to the world to censor their own comments of insult on another.
Best,
W