GunRelated
Well-Known Member
Well, I'm sure that we can agree that context is important. Maybe she is only referring to when her official duties permit her to exceed the speed limit and warrant her to demand control over the highway. I am therefore required to give the benefit of doubt, and to that end, I would not disagree with her statement.Did you take issue with any or all of what she said?
But I must also factor in the attitude and presentation of her message. Taking this into account, she puts off an attitude or sentiment of - I'm privileged and if you don't do what I want, I will find a way to make you regret it -. Seemingly, this attitude is not a good fit for the 'to protect and serve' banner. If she is so confident as to say that she is sure that she speaks for most other officers, I can only take her word for it. Maybe, the other officers that agree with her attitude or statement were just simping, she is somewhat attractive. But, to this end, I disagree entirely with the whole thing.