WilsonCombatant
Well-Known Member
Video of shooter getting bullied in school. Seems like one of those fem-bot, soy-boys.
Video of shooter getting bullied in school. Seems like one of those fem-bot, soy-boys.
Great one, got to remember that !It doesn't roll uphill.
Responding to the underlined section of the above -Thanks for this post that reveals a lot of anomalies counter to common sense in executive protection - to even neophytes like me. The whole thing really stinks - this was not in an urban environment with multi hi-rise vantage points. A relatively open field of view- less than 200 yds from the dais, a low eave height, low-slope prefab metal bldg as a sniper position??!! No drones?? Overlooked/ignored/ordered?? A guy observed and reported to police carrying a rifle and a ladder to access the position?? Video of USSS counter- snipers scoping said person in position +/- 40 seconds before the shots??
Are we all really stupid/psycho-conspiracy nuts as broad-brush painted by the Damnocraps and their mean screen media?
Who commands and controls the USSS? Are they under the same yoke and of the same ilk as the once vaunted FBI??
Has another agency been weaponized??
Man, I wish I could hit an 8 iron that far....This was a total cluster FK! Shooter within a 8 iron on a white roof. Witnesses telling LEO about him. The counter snipers looking dead at the shooter…come on man!! This doesn’t take a tier one unit to secure the area. Doesn’t get much easier. White roof…total failure or the powers that be let the shooter get shots off before erasing any culpability.
Blackwater got in hot water back in like '08 or so. It's been acquired a few times and ultimately merged with Triple Canopy in the mid 20-teens.,thperez1972, Does Blackwater still use the Shoot House and Range closest to it at the BR/EBRSO Range?
Damn damn damn…
SS Sniper couldn’t get the green light from top brass for 3 whole minutes?
Who verified that the rifle only had iron sights?lol the 4chan post talked about watching him adjust his scope, even though it was verified that the shooter only had iron sights
Video evidence shows the SS guys monitoring the sector that they had been monitoring for an hour-plus, before the shooting. Just like they do at every event we see counter-sniper units at. It just so happens that the douchebag was on the other side of a building that was (thankfully) in a sector being covered by USSS CS.Ok, so, video evidence of the SS focused directly on the shooter before he started shooting. He then got off 5 shots before a round was sent his way. I understand the shooter approached from the other side of the ridge but he was over the top with the rifle in front and apparently exposed for a significant amount of time positioning the rifle. Looks like there was some hesitation on the part of the SS. I admit, I can’t imagine an agent posting that, but I also don’t believe the whole of the US Secret Service is that inept.
The guy also was on the opposite side of the building prior to getting up past the crest and taking the shot.I'm not sure if you read the linked article but it did bring up a point I'm not ready to dismiss yet. One team was on the north building looking north. Another team was on the south building looking south. They are more effective the less overlap they have with respect to their areas of concern. So it's reasonable to say the north position wasn't monitoring south and the south position wasn't monitoring north. There are trees between the private property and the buildings. Looking at it in street view, the trees look to be of a descent height. There are no leaves in that picture but it was taken in November.
View attachment 168536
Here's an overhead picture of the area. The shooter was somewhere in that white circle. The orange lines show the dead spot due to the tree.
View attachment 168538
As best I could, I tried to get the perspective view from the SS to the shooter and from the shooter to the SS. To me, it shows where the tree could have interfered with the SS line of sight of the shooter. But it also shows how important it should have been to have someone on the roof to deny someone access to the blind spot.
View attachment 168539View attachment 168540
Has it been said which position, the north or the south, engaged the shooter and/or shot him? I mean, other than the 4chan post?
Yes, this is so totally unconfirmed, but hey, we are all making this up as we go right now...
Local SWAT was staging in the building the shooter fired from. It's possible SS counter sniper hesitated due to not knowing for sure whether the shooter was local SWAT or not.
30 minutes? Reports indicate shooter was seen on the roof 30 minutes prior to 1st shot.
30 minutes?
That’s all fine and good, but somehow they had a clear shot when they decided to pull the trigger. From the same position.I'm not sure if you read the linked article but it did bring up a point I'm not ready to dismiss yet. One team was on the north building looking north. Another team was on the south building looking south. They are more effective the less overlap they have with respect to their areas of concern. So it's reasonable to say the north position wasn't monitoring south and the south position wasn't monitoring north. There are trees between the private property and the buildings. Looking at it in street view, the trees look to be of a descent height. There are no leaves in that picture but it was taken in November.
View attachment 168536
Here's an overhead picture of the area. The shooter was somewhere in that white circle. The orange lines show the dead spot due to the tree.
View attachment 168538
As best I could, I tried to get the perspective view from the SS to the shooter and from the shooter to the SS. To me, it shows where the tree could have interfered with the SS line of sight of the shooter. But it also shows how important it should have been to have someone on the roof to deny someone access to the blind spot.
View attachment 168539View attachment 168540
Has it been said which position, the north or the south, engaged the shooter and/or shot him? I mean, other than the 4chan post?
That may be true. I just haven’t seen it reported yet that the return fire came from that position. I could be wrong with this one but I’m keeping an open mind until there’s real info to say I shouldn’t.That’s all fine and good, but somehow they had a clear shot when they decided to pull the trigger. From the same position.
It’s not that complicated.
Two (possibly 3) CS teams. Team with baseball caps view to shooter was obscured by trees. Team with boonie hats took the shot(s).That may be true. I just haven’t seen it reported yet that the return fire came from that position. I could be wrong with this one but I’m keeping an open mind until there’s real info to say I shouldn’t.
I quickly realized my error and deleted my post. Obviously not quick enough.SS Team 2 would have an unobstructed view but they would need to turn around to see him. The image clearly shows the tree between SS Team 1 and the shooter and reasonably could have been a factor.
View attachment 168638
You have the shooter too close to the edge of the building . Here's where he actually was. In this position either team could have gotten off a shot. But they still haven't stated which CS team took him outHuh? You do know that line of sight is generally a straight line, right? SS Team 2 would have an unobstructed view but they would need to turn around to see him. The image clearly shows the tree between SS Team 1 and the shooter and reasonably could have been a factor.
View attachment 168638
You have the shooter too close to the edge of the building . Here's where he actually was. In this position either team could have gotten off a shot. But they still haven't stated which CS team took him out
I quickly realized my error and deleted my post. Obviously not quick enough.