Gator 45/70
Well-Known Member
What we have here is a lack of unity, We need more unity in this thread!
Sounds like a happy home…can’t imagine why he was so forked up……SMHSil-40 in reply #313 above.. Daddy was a Libertarian Mom was a Democrat
Forbes reports a "Cryptic message" shooter left on online gaming website 'STEAM'-"July 13 will be my premiere, watch as it unfolds".
Oh wow. Who else have we heard of lately that had counselor or psychologist parents?I haven't read through this thread but I'll post this anyway:
I received a report (unconfirmed by me) that the shooter donated $15 to "actblue" (democrat/BLM) in 2022, and that the shooters parents are far-left psychotherapists.
If Pocahontas had a son…
They ID’d him in less than an hour. How’d they do that with DNA if he wasn’t on file? How would he be on file with no priors? Facial recognition? He was **** in the face. They also found his car really quick outside the rally.Who was Thomas Matthew Crooks?
Thomas Crooks had not been carrying ID, so investigators used DNA and facial recognition technology to identify him, the FBI said.
He was from Bethel Park in Pennsylvania, about 70km (43 miles) from the site of the attempted assassination, and graduated in 2022 from Bethel Park High School with a $500 (£385) prize for maths and science, according to a local newspaper.
Crooks worked in a local nursing home kitchen just a short drive away from his home, where staff members have said that he passed a background check and raised no concerns.
The Community College of Allegheny, or CCAC, has confirmed that Crooks attended the school between September 2021 and May 2024. He graduated with an associate degree in engineering science.
In a statement sent to the BBC, the college noted that he graduated "with high honours" and that a review of his records turned up no disciplinary, student conduct or security-related incidents.
The University of Pittsburgh also told the BBC that in February he was accepted as a transfer student there for the fall 2024 semester. The following month, he elected not to attend.
State voter records show that he was a registered Republican, according to US media.
He also donated $15 to liberal campaign group ActBlue in 2021, according to an election donation filing and news reports.
He had a membership at a local shooting club, the Clairton Sportsmen's Club, for at least a year, the club confirmed to the BBC.
Numerous media sources have cited Crooks was a registered republican, that isn't hard to determine checking state records. I would bet his father is also a registered repub too (daddy influence). One of my biggest questions is Crooks could not have expected to survive this attempt. No way he gets away. He must have recently become disenchanted with trump for some reason.
source article
my suspicions confirmed: "A resident of Bethel Park, about an hour away from where the shooting occurred, Crooks was a registered Republican who would have been eligible to cast his first presidential vote in the Nov. 5 election in which Trump is challenging President Joe Biden. Public records show his father is a registered Republican and his mother a registered Democrat, and that as a 17-year-old Crooks made a $15 donation to a Democratic Party cause."
above source article
Today's facial recognition software used by LE searches all databases in split second. Voter registration, state DL, military records, passport, school registrations and IDs. They didn't need his DNA on file. Took a pic of his face, uploaded, and 15 seconds later, they had his ID. The Patriot Act after 2001 unlocked so many doors it isn't funny.They ID’d him in less than an hour. How’d they do that with DNA if he wasn’t on file? How would he be on file with no priors? Facial recognition? He was **** in the face.
I feel better knowing the shooter is now likely running around, naked, in the lake of fire.Sil-40 in reply #313 above.. Daddy was a Libertarian Mom was a Democrat
Forbes reports a "Cryptic message" shooter left on online gaming website 'STEAM'-"July 13 will be my premiere, watch as it unfolds".
Well they must have done one hell of a dust off with his face then. That boy’s mama wouldn’t recognize him.Today's facial recognition software used by LE searches all databases in split second. Voter registration, state DL, military records, passport, school registrations and IDs. They didn't need his DNA on file. Took a pic of his face, uploaded, and 15 seconds later, they had his ID. The Patriot Act after 2001 unlocked so many doors it isn't funny.
They ID’d him in less than an hour. How’d they do that with DNA if he wasn’t on file? How would he be on file with no priors? Facial recognition? He was **** in the face. They also found his car really quick outside the rally.
Whole lotta Oswald patsy shite going on here?
This video brings up more questions, but something crazy at 17:20 y’all need to see. SS guy pointing his rifle at Trump?!
Today's facial recognition software used by LE searches all databases in split second. Voter registration, state DL, military records, passport, school registrations and IDs. They didn't need his DNA on file. Took a pic of his face, uploaded, and 15 seconds later, they had his ID. The Patriot Act after 2001 unlocked so many doors it isn't funny.
They ID’d him in less than an hour. How’d they do that with DNA if he wasn’t on file? How would he be on file with no priors? Facial recognition? He was **** in the face. They also found his car really quick outside the rally.
Whole lotta Oswald patsy shite going on here?
This video brings up more questions, but something crazy at 17:20 y’all need to see. SS guy pointing his rifle at Trump?!
The biggest questions I have after watching the video starting at 17:20 is do people really believe the guy pointed his rifle at Trump? If so, is it stupidity, ignorance, or just a willingness to believe anything as long as it supports what they want to believe?
The SS guy is not pointing his rifle at Trump. You can clearly see, at :17:28, the SS guy is standing in front of the SUV. The video was shot from a little ways away. Differences in depth are more difficult to see the greater the zoom. And the video is cropped. It also stops before other things give away their BS conclusion. Below is the full video as it was shown. It should start at around the same time as the "he pointed a rifle at Trump" clip from the nonsense video. At 10:47 in the full video, the SS guy casts a shadow on the white tent. That tells us he is close to the pole. The SUV starts to drive away at 10:51. You can see the SUV turn left the turn right. That's because the SUV has to drive around the crane truck. That should help show how far in front of the SUV the SS guy was. At 11:13, you can see a bald guy walk from left to right. He's on this side of the white tent. That means he's about where the SS guy was. As he keeps walking, you can see that the SUV hasn't completely passed up that spot. If the SS guy were pointing a rifle at Trump, he would have needed to point almost toward the camera and not to the left. And here's a bunch of pictures to better show the difference in depth.